Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Krishna Ayyar Vs. Muthusami Ayyar

Krishna Ayyar vs Muthusami Ayyar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Nov 26, 1901
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/788921

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Property

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Transfer of Property Act - Act IV of 1882, Section 89--Order absolute for sale--Notice to defendant of application--Practice. -

Key legal issue
Property

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Krishna Ayyar

Respondent

Muthusami Ayyar

Legal References

Reported In
(1902)ILR25Mad506

Excerpt

transfer of property act - act iv of 1882, section 89--order absolute for sale--notice to defendant of application--practice. - 1. the application having been made within one year after the passing of the decree, no notice of the application for an order absolute for sale is necessary. section 89 of the transfer of property act does not require any notice to be given. we may add that the appellant does not show that he was in any way prejudiced by the want of such notice.2. we dismiss the appeal with costs.

Full Judgment

1. The application having been made within one year after the passing of the decree, no notice of the application for an order absolute for sale is necessary. Section 89 of the Transfer of Property Act does not require any notice to be given. We may add that the appellant does not show that he was in any way prejudiced by the want of such notice.

2. We dismiss the appeal with costs.

Continue Your Research

Same Parties Krishna Ayyar vs Muthusami Ayyar Same Subject Property Same Judge Benson and ;Bhashyam Ayyangar, JJ.
Property Transfer of property For sale one year no no

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales