One Year - Judgment Search Results

Good Year India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2005)(190)ELT355TriDel

2. Applicants filed this application for waiver of pre-deposit of duty of Rs. 2,08,48,009/-. The demand was confirmed on the...

Good Year India Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1999SC1558; 1997(95)ELT450(SC)

1. The only question that falls for consideration in these appeals is whether inner tube valves imported by the appellants...

Shijin, 20 Years, S/O.Alexander and ors. Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

O R D E R V. RAMKUMAR, J. ............................. B.A. No. 6656 of 2010 .......................................... Dated: 26th day of October,...

Good Year (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2003)(90)ECC151

show cause notice is time-barred. As the issue involved is one of interpreting the Tariff Heading under which the impugned product 1. In this Appeal, filed by M/s. Good Year (India) Ltd., the issue involved is whether the rubberized and

Good Year India Ltd. Vs. C.C., Icd

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

then the provisions regarding filing of a claim within 1 year or 6 months would become redundant as the Appeal proceedings

Jesna, 16 Years (Minor) Vs. Shihabudheen P. and Others

Court: Kerala

The amount awarded under the head bystanders expenses in the year 2008 at the rate of 100/- per day is also

Good Year India Limited, Convent Road,ponnurunny and Another Vs. P.C. ...

Court: Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

that the complainant has used the tyre for more than one year and 2 months and it was not proper for the complainant has used the tyre for more than one year and 2 months and it was not proper for the

Good Year India Limited Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1995]97STC249(AP)

Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, under which transmission beltings are one of the specified items exigible to tax at the point turnover relating to sales of transmission relating for the assessment year 1986-87. 2. The petitioner is a registered dealer under the

Good Year India Ltd., Jaipur Vs. Industrial Tribunal, Rajasthan, Jaipu ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1969Raj95; (1968)IILLJ682Raj

on the ground that it was arbitrary as it heard one of the parties affected while denied the right of hearing respondents from proceeding with the purported adjudication.2. The petitioner, Good Year India Ltd., is a company duly incorporated under the Indian

Year Mamud Mondal Vs. Paomocha Sarkar and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1925Cal1225

not appear that teat was paid and accepted in the year in which the suit was brought and that there was