Property - Judgment Search Results
Criterion Properties Plc (Appellants) Vs. Stratford Uk Properties Llc ...
Court: House of Lords
Decided on: Jun-17-2004
1998 Criterion and Oaktree agreed to form a limited partnership together for the purpose of investing in real property in the United Kingdom. It was contemplated that the bulk of the funding would be provided by Oaktree
Fort Properties Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-16-1993
Reported in: (1993)115CTR(Bom)355; [1994]208ITR232(Bom)
and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified that the purchase and sale of Fort property in the hands of the assessee-company was a purchase and sale of capital asset and the assessee-company was,
Amby Properties Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-14-2000
Reported in: (2000)3CALLT31(HC)
respondent No. 1 (writ petitioner) who will hold the key as a Special Officer and shall keep the property as it is subject to the decision in the above appeal and shall not encumber, transfer and/or dispose
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dankha Devi Agarwal (Dead) Throurgh Lrs. Vs. Tara Properties Pvt. Limi ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-17-2006
Reported in: AIR2006SC3068; [2006]133CompCas236(SC); (2006)5CompLJ409(SC); 2006(8)SCALE101; (2006)7SCC382
Daily Statesman, it came to light that the tax liability of the company in so far as the property leased to the company was concerned was to the tune of Rs. 23,06,748/- which was outstanding. On coming
Sugrabai Alibhai and Others Vs. Amtee Properties Pvt. Ltd. and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-24-1982
Reported in: [1984]55CompCas734(Bom)
issued shares of the company. The business of the company consists of management and dealing in certain immovable properties in Bombay.3. The petitioners have challenged the right of respondents Nos. 2 to 8 to obtain inspection of
M/S. Atma Ram Properties (P) Ltd. Vs. M/S. Pal Properties (India) Pvt. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-23-2001
Reported in: 2001VIIAD(Delhi)131; 63(2001)DLT694b; 2002(62)DRJ623
ORDERA.K. Sikri, J. 1. The plaintiff has filed this Suit for recovery of possession of the property which is a showroom and bears Municipal No. H-72, Connaught Circus, New Delhi (hereinafter to be called as
Hosur Kasipathy, Ex. Property Guardian of the Minors Mutchala Kesava R ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-09-1949
Reported in: AIR1950Mad506
ORDERKrishnaswami Nayudu, J.1. The guardian of the property of the minors is the petitioner in this civil revision petition. By an order of the District Judge,
Nevada Properties Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Director Ltd. Vs. The State of ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-24-2019
of Judicature at Bombay dated November 29, 2010 wherein the majority judgment has held that the expression ‘any property’ used in sub-section (1) of Section 102 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as
Esteem Properties P.ltd. Vs. Chetan Kamble .
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-28-2022
in holding that the petitioner are in possession of land before C.T.S. No.229 and it is their private property.” 29……….. ORDER The revision petition is allowed, Order of all authorities below are set aside, I hold and
Property Owners Association Vs. State Of Maharashtra .
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-05-2024
Reportable 2024 INSC835IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.1012 of 2002 Property Owners Association & Ors. …Appellants Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents With SLP(C) No.5777 of 1992 With
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free