Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

D. Rajagopal Vs. Tamil Nadu Small Industries Development Corporation Ltd. Represented by Its Managing Director and ors.

D. Rajagopal vs Tamil Nadu Small Industries Development Corporation Ltd. Represented by Its Managing Director and O

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Mar 21, 1986
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/783607

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Writ Petition No. 2977/85
Subject
Labour and Industrial

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Labour and Industrial
Acts & sections
Companies Act; Service Rules - Rules 3 and 10(2)

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

D. Rajagopal

Respondent

Tamil Nadu Small Industries Development Corporation Ltd. Represented by Its Managing Director and O

Legal References

Acts
Companies Act; Service Rules - Rules 3 and 10(2)
Cases Referred
W.B.S.E. Board v. Desh Bandhu Ghosh
Reported In
[1987(54)FLR194]; (1986)IILLJ425Mad

Excerpt

- order1. petitioner seeks for a declaration that r. 3. 10(2) of the service rules of respondent-corporation, is illegal. 2. already, dealing with the points arising in w.p. 2976 of 1985, it has been held that the corporation is an instrumentality of the state of tamil nadu in respect of service condition of its employees, and they are entitled to protective benefits under parts iii and iv of the constitution, as held in ajay masia v. khalid mujib sehravarni : (1981)illj103sc and, therefore, any term relating to their service conditions, which confers arbitrary powers, and which is capable of vicious discrimination, is illegal. mr. santhanam, learned counsel for corporation would submit that the rules having been framed by the board of directors of company registered under the companies act, petitioner cannot seek for such a declaration. this plea is without substance, because as 'other authority' under art. 12, it cannot enforce an illegal condition of service, which offends any of the provisions in parts iii and iv of the constitution. a similar provision formulated by west bengal electricity board was struck down by the supreme court in w.b.s.e. board v. desh bandhu ghosh : (1985)illj373sc . hence, r. 3. 10(2), is hereby declared as illegal. therefore, this writ petition is allowed with costs. counsel's fee rs. 250/-.

Full Judgment

ORDER

1. Petitioner seeks for a declaration that R. 3. 10(2) of the Service Rules of respondent-Corporation, is illegal.

2. Already, dealing with the points arising in W.P. 2976 of 1985, it has been held that the Corporation is an instrumentality of the State of Tamil Nadu in respect of service condition of its employees, and they are entitled to protective benefits under Parts III and IV of the Constitution, as held in Ajay Masia v. Khalid Mujib Sehravarni : (1981)ILLJ103SC and, therefore, any term relating to their service conditions, which confers arbitrary powers, and which is capable of vicious discrimination, is illegal. Mr. Santhanam, learned counsel for Corporation would submit that the Rules having been framed by the Board of Directors of Company registered under the Companies Act, petitioner cannot seek for such a declaration. This plea is without substance, because as 'other authority' under Art. 12, it cannot enforce an illegal condition of service, which offends any of the provisions in Parts III and IV of the Constitution. A similar provision formulated by West Bengal Electricity Board was struck down by the Supreme Court in W.B.S.E. Board v. Desh Bandhu Ghosh : (1985)ILLJ373SC . Hence, R. 3. 10(2), is hereby declared as illegal. Therefore, this writ petition is allowed with costs. Counsel's fee Rs. 250/-.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial