Advanced Search Results

Sheela Vs. the Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal-cum-

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Labour and Industrial

PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1 CWP No.5336 of 2012 Sheela ....Petitioner Versus The Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Hisar, District Hisar and another ....Respondents 2. CWP No.5337 of 2012 Bhagat Ram ....Petitioner Versus The Presiding

Engine Valves Ltd. Vs. Labour Court, Madras and Another

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11A

Reported in : (1991)ILLJ372Mad

Writ Appeal is allowed to the extent indicated above. But, there will be no order as to costs. Labour and Industrial - dismissal - Section 11A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - appeal against setting aside Order of dismissal

Christian Medical College Hospital Employees' Union and Anr. Vs. Chris ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 9-A, 10, 11-A, 12 and 33; Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 19, 25(1), 25(2), 30, 30(1), 31(1), 41, 42, 43, 136 and 226

Reported in : AIR1988SC37; JT1987(4)SC129; 1988LabIC225; (1988)ILLJ263SC; 1987(2)SCALE798; (1987)4SCC691; [1988]1SCR546

dismissed. We, accordingly, allow this appeal, set aside the common judgment of the High Court in Writ Petitions. Labour and Industrial - applicability of Sections - Sections 9-A, 10, 11-A, 12, and 33 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and

Basu Deba Das Vs. M.R. Bhope and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11-A

Reported in : 1993(2)BomCR90; (1993)IILLJ1022Bom

application for review and the Part-II Award dated September 27, 1988 passed by the Presiding Officer of the Labour Court in Reference (I.D.A) No. 503 of 1982. 2. By the Award the action of the second respondent … of the dispute. The dispute, being eclipsed, protempore, as a result of such an award, will be revived and industrial peace will again be ruptured. Again another object of expeditious disposal of an industrial dispute (see Section 15)

Management of Essorpe Mills (P) Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Cou ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11A; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (1998)IILLJ1204Mad

the writ petition and the same is, therefore, dismissed, but in the circumstances of the case without costs. Labour and Industrial - termination - Section 11A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and Article 226 of Constitution of India -

South Indian Bank Ltd. Vs. V.G. Krishnakumar and anr.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11A; Madhya Pradesh Industrial Relations Act, 1960 - Sections 107A; Constitution of India - Articles 30(1) and 226

Reported in : (2006)IILLJ661Ker

a balance between the two competing views, namely one to protect the nation from the calamity of indisciplined labour and second to protect the workers from unjust treatment. To err is human but forgive is divine. Perhaps one … S. Siri Jagan, J.1. The management in an Industrial dispute is the appellant before us. They are aggrieved by the judgment of the learned single Judge in

The Management of Essorpe Mills Private Limited Vs. the Presiding Offi ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1999)1MLJ77

ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. Aggrieved by the award of the Labour Court in I.D. No. 22 of 1987 dated 9.5.1991, the Management has filed the above writ petition.2. The … rendered, which is an offence punishable under Indian Penal Code, it would be against interests of other workmen and industrial development, if adequate punishments are not imposed when offences under Indian Penal Code are established. He could have

Bannett Coleman and Co. Ltd. Vs. the Presiding Officer and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10

Reported in : 35(1988)DLT101; 1988(15)DRJ1; 1988RLR322

in the application itself and in the absence of the same, no permission could be granted. (2) The industrial dispute having arisen between the respondent- workman and the petitioner-management, the same was referred to the Labour Court … of the Constitution of India by the management is directed against the order dated 8-10-1987 passed by the Labour Court whereby the application of the management requesting for adducing additional evidence if domestic inquiry is found to

Madikal Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. and anr. Vs. Labour Court and anr.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1988)IILLJ49Ker

pardoned. The board rejected his request.4. At the instance of the second respondent, treating the dispute as an industrial dispute under the Industrial Disputes Act, it was referred for adjudication by the Labour Court, Calicut. On 27th … to the men working under him and sanctioned leave to them, that he was empowered to engage casual labour and took review of the position of strength, that he could take decisions regarding overtime work of the staff

Rajasthan Medical and Sales Representatives Union and ors. Vs. Industr ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Sales Promotion Employees (Condition of Service) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 6 and 6(2); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2

Reported in : [2000(87)FLR563]; (2001)ILLJ91Raj; 2000(4)WLC473

with the private respondents. Their services were terminated with the result that the reference was made to the Labour Court cum Industrial Tribunal to adjudicate on the legality, justification or propriety of the order of termination. The