Advanced Search Results
Sri Rajendra Mills Limited Vs. the Regional Commissioner, Employees Pr ...
Chennai
Sathia Dev, J.
Aug-24-1981
Labour and Industrial
(1982)ILLJ352Mad
1. Though in the petition, petitioner had taken more than one point covering the periods of default, the petitioner would stress on the failure of the respondent to consider about the plea of power cut which...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManagement of Binny Ltd. (B and C Mills), Madras-12 Vs. K. Elumalai an ...
Chennai
Sathia Dev, J.
Jan-06-1988
Labour and Industrial
Factories Act 1948 - Sections 2
(1988)ILLJ398Mad
ORDER1. Petitioner seeks to quash the order of the second respondent in T.A.E. Case No. 84 of 1982 dated 20th July 1983. Petitioner states as follows : First respondent was employed as Fireman in the petitioner's...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManagement of Madras Gymkhana Club Vs. Presiding Officer Iii, Addition ...
Chennai
Sathia Dev, J.
Nov-01-1985
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 33C(2) and 36(2)
[1987(54)FLR195]; (1986)IILLJ415Mad
ORDER1. These two writ petitions are filed by Management of Madras Gymkhana Club against similar orders passed by first respondent - Labour Court in claim petitions filed under S. 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, on a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
T. Seeralan Vs. the Presiding Officer Ii Additional Labour Court and o ...
Chennai
Sathia Dev, J.
Mar-03-1986
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act
(1986)IILLJ85Mad
ORDER1. Petitioner was a workman employed as a Stores Attender in the canteen run by second respondent company at Mount Road. He was charge sheeted on 10th November, 1976 stating that, on that day at about...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskD. Rajagopal Vs. Tamil Nadu Small Industries Development Corporation L ...
Chennai
Sathia Dev, J.
Mar-21-1986
Labour and Industrial
Companies Act; Service Rules - Rules 3 and 10(2)
[1987(54)FLR194]; (1986)IILLJ425Mad
ORDER1. Petitioner seeks for a declaration that R. 3. 10(2) of the Service Rules of respondent-Corporation, is illegal. 2. Already, dealing with the points arising in W.P. 2976 of 1985, it has been held that the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNellai Mavatta Cooli Thozhilalar Sangam Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and or ...
Chennai
Sathia Dev, J.
Mar-23-1984
Labour and Industrial
Contract Labour (Abolition and Regulation) Act, 1970; Rajasthan Famine Relief Works Employees (Exemption from Labour Laws) Act; Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Constitution of India - Article 23
(1984)IILLJ270Mad
ORDER1. Nellai Mavatta Cooli Thozhilalar Sangam, Tirunelveli, is the petitioner and it seeks the issue of a writ of mandamus to direct respondents 1 and 2 to register respondents 3 and 4 as principal employers of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManagement, Kottabomman Transport Corporation Vs. M. Lucas and ors.
Chennai
Sathia Dev, J.
Feb-05-1982
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10(1) and 11A
(1983)ILLJ458Mad
ORDER1. Kattabomman Transport Corporation, the Petitioner herein, is seeking for quashing the Award of the Labour Court passed in I.D. No. 123 of 1977 dated 20 September, 1978, whereby it had directed that First Respondent had...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Poly Clinic, Nagercoil Vs. Regional Commissioner, Employees Provid ...
Chennai
Sathia Dev, J.
Sep-24-1981
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(9); Employees Provident Funds and Misc. Provisions Act - Sections 2 and 5
(1983)ILLJ449Mad
ORDER1. The point involved in this petition lies within a very short compass, but is an interesting one. The contention of the petitioner is, in so far as apprentice trainees are concerned they are not covered...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Secretary, Spencer and Co. Ltd., Madras-600 002 Vs. the Additional ...
Chennai
Sathia Dev, J.
Sep-28-1981
Labour and Industrial
Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act - Sections 41 and 41(2)
(1982)IILLJ36Mad
1. Messrs. Spencer & Co. Ltd., is the petitioner. Second respondent filed an appeal under S. 41(2) of the Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, challenging the order dated 9-4-1976 terminating his services on medical grounds...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Meyyappan Vs. the Asst. General Manager, Staff Department, Bank of ...
Chennai
Sathia Dev, J.
Jul-17-1983
Labour and Industrial
Constitution of India - Article 311; Industrial Relations Act, 1971; Specific Relief Act - Sections 14(1) and 41
(1984)ILLJ50Mad
ORDER1. Plaintiff is petitioner herein, who filed a suit for a declaration that he is entitled to continue in service till he completes 60 years of age on 9th September, 1984 and for permanent injunction restraining...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »