Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Thaman Chetti Vs. Alagiri Chetti

Thaman Chetti vs Alagiri Chetti

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Dec 09, 1890
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/781684

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code - Act X of 1882, Sections 17, 528. - - But the Acting District Magistrate being of opinion that there were no sufficient grounds for the transfer, but that on the contrary there were very good grounds against it, withdrew the case from the file of the Taluk Magistrate and transferred it bac...

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Thaman Chetti

Respondent

Alagiri Chetti

Legal References

Reported In
(1891)ILR14Mad399

Excerpt

criminal procedure code - act x of 1882, sections 17, 528. - - but the acting district magistrate being of opinion that there were no sufficient grounds for the transfer, but that on the contrary there were very good grounds against it, withdrew the case from the file of the taluk magistrate and transferred it back to that of the kodaikanal sub-magistrate.1. in this case the acting joint magistrate of madura transferred a complaint of a coffee theft from the second-class magistrate of kodaikanal to the taluk magistrate of periaculam. but the acting district magistrate being of opinion that there were no sufficient grounds for the transfer, but that on the contrary there were very good grounds against it, withdrew the case from the file of the taluk magistrate and transferred it back to that of the kodaikanal sub-magistrate. it is contended that the district magistrate had no jurisdiction to order the retransfer under section 528, criminal procedure code.2. we are, however, of opinion that a magistrate, who is subordinate to a sub-division magistrate, is also subordinate to the district magistrate within the meaning of section 528. neither section 17, which declares such magistrate to be subject only to the general control of the district magistrate, nor schedule iii which specifies the ordinary powers of a district magistrate, can be so construed as to take away the special power conferred by section 528. we decline to interfere and dismiss this petition.

Full Judgment

1. In this case the Acting Joint Magistrate of Madura transferred a complaint of a coffee theft from the Second-class Magistrate of Kodaikanal to the Taluk Magistrate of Periaculam. But the Acting District Magistrate being of opinion that there were no sufficient grounds for the transfer, but that on the contrary there were very good grounds against it, withdrew the case from the file of the Taluk Magistrate and transferred it back to that of the Kodaikanal Sub-Magistrate. It is contended that the District Magistrate had no jurisdiction to order the retransfer under Section 528, Criminal Procedure Code.

2. We are, however, of opinion that a Magistrate, who is subordinate to a Sub-Division Magistrate, is also subordinate to the District Magistrate within the meaning of Section 528. Neither Section 17, which declares such Magistrate to be subject only to the general control of the District Magistrate, nor Schedule III which specifies the ordinary powers of a District Magistrate, can be so construed as to take away the special power conferred by Section 528. We decline to interfere and dismiss this petition.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial