Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Abdul Samad and ors. Vs. the State

Abdul Samad and ors. vs The State

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Decided Jul 05, 1950
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/754062

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Criminal Transfer case No. 35 of 1950
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Criminal
Acts & sections
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 528, 528(2) and 528(5)

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Abdul Samad and ors.

Advocate Inder Nath, Adv.

Respondent

The State

Advocate Mansharam, Govt. Adv.

Legal References

Acts
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 528, 528(2) and 528(5)
Reported In
AIR1951Raj121

Excerpt

- orderbapna, j.1. this is an appln for transfer of a criminal case. the six petnrs were charged with certain offences under section 6, essential supplies act & section 420, penal code. the incident relates to certain occurrence which took place at kuchaman city. the chalan was put up before the ct of the sub-divisional mag, parbatsar on 23-4-1950. this ct had jurisdiction both as regards the nature of the offence & the place of occurrence. the dist mag nagaur passed an order on 13-5-1950 for the transfer of the case from the ct of the sub-divisional mag, parbatsar to the ct of the extra mag nagaur which has given rise to this petn. the order of the learned dist mag is a short one & is in the following words:'the above noted case is hereby transferred to the extra mag nagaur from the ct of the sub-divisional mag, parbatsar with immediate effect.'2. the dist mag purports to have passed this order under section 528 (2), cr. p. c. he had no doubt power to transfer this case but the exercise of that power was limited by the provisions of sub-section 5 namely, that the mag in making the order should record in writing his reasons for making the same. the learned dist mag does not seem to have recorded any reasons since they are not found in the order & the learned govt advocate is not able to say whether there is any separate record of the same anywhere. the order of the learned dist mag is obviously incorrect & not in conformity with law. it may be pointed out that there are 30 witnesses most of whom are residents of kuchaman & parbatsar is only about 20 miles from the said place. in the absence of any grounds disclosed in the order of the dist mag, the order of transfer of the case to the ct of the extra mag; nagaur as stated above, is improper. the order of the dist mag of 13-5-1950 is therefore set aside & the case is re-transferred to the sub divisional mag, parbatsar for proceeding according to law.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Bapna, J.

1. This is an appln for transfer of a criminal case. The six petnrs were charged with certain offences under Section 6, Essential Supplies Act & Section 420, Penal Code. The incident relates to certain occurrence which took place at Kuchaman City. The chalan was put up before the Ct of the Sub-Divisional Mag, Parbatsar on 23-4-1950. This Ct had jurisdiction both as regards the nature of the offence & the place of occurrence. The Dist Mag Nagaur passed an order on 13-5-1950 for the Transfer of the case from the Ct of the Sub-Divisional Mag, Parbatsar to the Ct of the Extra Mag Nagaur which has given rise to this petn. The order of the learned Dist Mag is a short one & is in the following words:

'The above noted case is hereby transferred to the Extra Mag Nagaur from the Ct of the Sub-Divisional Mag, Parbatsar with immediate effect.'

2. The Dist Mag purports to have passed this order under Section 528 (2), Cr. P. C. He had no doubt power to transfer this case but the exercise of that power was limited by the provisions of Sub-section 5 namely, that the Mag in making the order should record in writing his reasons for making the same. The learned Dist Mag does not seem to have recorded any reasons since they are not found in the order & the learned Govt Advocate is not able to say whether there is any separate record of the same anywhere. The order of the learned Dist Mag is obviously incorrect & not in conformity with law. It may be pointed out that there are 30 witnesses most of whom are residents of Kuchaman & Parbatsar is only about 20 miles from the said place. In the absence of any grounds disclosed in the order of the Dist Mag, the order of transfer of the case to the Ct of the extra Mag; Nagaur as stated above, is improper. The order of the Dist Mag of 13-5-1950 is therefore set aside & the case is re-transferred to the Sub Divisional Mag, Parbatsar for proceeding according to law.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial