In Writing - Judgment Search Results
Pointec Writing Instruments Pvt. Vs. Commr. of Cus.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Jun-18-2004
Reported in: (2004)(170)ELT591Tri(Bang.)
126 (Tri. - Kolkata) has held that Ball Point Pen Ink which is water based and used for writing is classifiable only under sub-heading 3215.10 and not under the residuary heading 'Other' falling under sub-heading 3215.90, as
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Cello Writing Instruments and Container ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-31-2009
Reported in: [2009]319ITR63(Bom)
Matched in: Parties Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Cello Writing Instruments and Containers P. Ltd.
Holyoke Water Power Co. Vs. American Writing Paper Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-01-1937
Holyoke Water Power Co. v. American Writing Paper Co. - 300 U.S. 324 (1937) U.S. Supreme Court Holyoke Water Power Co. v. American Writing Paper
18-section briefs on any result in this list
M/S Sanghvi Writing Points Private Limited vs Union of India Through t ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2026
COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 24.03.2026+ LPA 152/2026 & CM APPL No. 18271/2026M/S SANGHVI WRITING POINTS PRIVATELIMITED .....Appellant Through: Mr. Vineet Sinha, Advocate.versusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY& ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Puja
Gobindgarh. Vs. Orally as Well as in Writing.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-17-2012
Municipal Committee in April, 1991. The petitioner had made certain complaints against respondent No.4 orally as well as in writing. Respondent No.4 started nursing a grudge against the petitioner due to the complaints of mal- functioning. The petitioner
In Re: Todays Writing Products
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Nov-01-2007
1.1 M/s Todays Writing Products Ltd. promoted by the Drolia family and incorporated in 1992, were engaged in manufacture of pens, refills
Manchharam Bhiku Patil and Anr. Vs. Dattu and two Ors. who write Bhiku ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-08-1919
Reported in: (1920)ILR64Bom166
Shah, J.1. The plaintiffs in this case claimed to be the illegitimate sons of one Bhiku and sued to recover by partition their 3/5ths share in the moveable and immoveable properties left by Bhiku. The defendant...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free