Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

In Writing - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 18 2004

Pointec Writing Instruments Pvt. Vs. Commr. of Cus.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Jun-18-2004

Reported in: (2004)(170)ELT591Tri(Bang.)

126 (Tri. - Kolkata) has held that Ball Point Pen Ink which is water based and used for writing is classifiable only under sub-heading 3215.10 and not under the residuary heading 'Other' falling under sub-heading 3215.90, as


Mar 31 2009

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Cello Writing Instruments and Container ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-31-2009

Reported in: [2009]319ITR63(Bom)

Matched in: Parties Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Cello Writing Instruments and Containers P. Ltd.


Mar 01 1937

Holyoke Water Power Co. Vs. American Writing Paper Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-01-1937

Holyoke Water Power Co. v. American Writing Paper Co. - 300 U.S. 324 (1937) U.S. Supreme Court Holyoke Water Power Co. v. American Writing Paper


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 24 2026

M/S Sanghvi Writing Points Private Limited vs Union of India Through t ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-24-2026

COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 24.03.2026+ LPA 152/2026 & CM APPL No. 18271/2026M/S SANGHVI WRITING POINTS PRIVATELIMITED .....Appellant Through: Mr. Vineet Sinha, Advocate.versusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY& ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Puja


Nov 17 2012

Gobindgarh. Vs. Orally as Well as in Writing.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-17-2012

Municipal Committee in April, 1991. The petitioner had made certain complaints against respondent No.4 orally as well as in writing. Respondent No.4 started nursing a grudge against the petitioner due to the complaints of mal- functioning. The petitioner


Nov 01 2007

In Re: Todays Writing Products

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Nov-01-2007

1.1 M/s Todays Writing Products Ltd. promoted by the Drolia family and incorporated in 1992, were engaged in manufacture of pens, refills


Aug 08 1919

Manchharam Bhiku Patil and Anr. Vs. Dattu and two Ors. who write Bhiku ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-08-1919

Reported in: (1920)ILR64Bom166

Shah, J.1. The plaintiffs in this case claimed to be the illegitimate sons of one Bhiku and sued to recover by partition their 3/5ths share in the moveable and immoveable properties left by Bhiku. The defendant...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial