The Embassy of Italy Vs. Chawla Techno Construct Limited

The Embassy of Italy vs Chawla Techno Construct Limited

Disposition Application allowed Court Delhi Decided May 06, 1999

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/701551

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/701551
Court: Delhi High Court
Judge: S.K. Mahajan, J.
Decided On: May 06, 1999
Case Number: O.M.P. No. 212 of 1997
Subject: Arbitration
Disposition: Application allowed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 28--Extension of time--Application seeking revocation of authority of arbitrator rejected--Time to make award extended. -

Key legal issue: Arbitration
Outcome / disposition: Application allowed
Acts & sections: Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 5, 11 and 12

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Embassy of Italy

Advocate V.P. Singh, Sr. Adv.,; Jasmeet Singh and; V.K. Sidharthan

Respondent

Chawla Techno Construct Limited

Advocate G.L. Sanghi, Sr. Adv. and ; Barka Babbar, Adv.

Legal References

Acts: Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 5, 11 and 12
Reported In: 79(1999)DLT540; 1999(49)DRJ626

Excerpt

arbitration act, 1940 - section 28--extension of time--application seeking revocation of authority of arbitrator rejected--time to make award extended. - s.k. mahajan, j.1. the application is opposed by the respondent mainly on the very grounds on which the respondent has sought the revocation of authority of the arbitrator in o.m.p. no. 237/97. for the reasons given in my order dismissing the petition of the respondent under sections 5, 11 and 12 of the arbitration act being o.m.p. no. 237/97, i am of the opinion that no ground whatsoever has been made out for opposing the extension of time to enable the arbitrator to proceed further in the matter.2. accordingly, allowing the application, i extend the time to enable the arbitrator to make and publish his award by four months from the date of this order. the petition, accordingly, stands disposed of.

Full Judgment

S.K. Mahajan, J.

1. The application is opposed by the respondent mainly on the very grounds on which the respondent has sought the revocation of authority of the Arbitrator in O.M.P. No. 237/97. For the reasons given in my order dismissing the petition of the respondent under Sections 5, 11 and 12 of the Arbitration Act being O.M.P. No. 237/97, I am of the opinion that no ground whatsoever has been made out for opposing the extension of time to enable the Arbitrator to proceed further in the matter.

2. Accordingly, allowing the application, I extend the time to enable the Arbitrator to make and publish his award by four months from the date of this order. The petition, accordingly, stands disposed of.

Same Court & Year Delhi · 1999 Same Parties The Embassy of Italy vs Chawla Techno Construct Limited Same Subject Arbitration Same Judge S.K. Mahajan, J. Acts & Sections Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 5, 11 and 12

Arbitration