11 And 12 - Judgment Search Results

Date of Decision:-11.12.2012 Vs. Versus

Court: Punjab and Haryana

same has been so recorded for a limited purpose of deciding the instant petition in this relevant direction. 11.12.2012 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) AS Judge

Ramakant Mayekar and Ors. Vs. Smt. Celine D'Selva

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1996SC826; JT1995(9)SC73; 1995(7)SCALE72; (1996)1SCC399; [1995]Supp6SCR492

ORDERJ.S. Verma, J.1. This is an appeal by the returned candidate under Section 116A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (for short 'the R.P. Act') against the judgment dated 5th/6th … This is on the ground that corrupt practice set out above under Sub-sections (3) and (3A) of Section 123 of the Representation of Peoples Act, 1951 have been proved to have been committed with the consent of

Goa Sampling Employees' Association Vs. General Superintendence Co. of ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1985SC357; (1985)87BOMLR151; [1985(50)FLR458]; 1985LabIC666; (1987)IILLJ217SC; 1985MhLJ646(SC); 1984(2)SCALE978; (1985)1SCC206; [1985]2SCR373; 1985(1)SLJ309(SC); 1985(17

the meaning of item (1) of Schedule A of the Health Cess Act or Entry 51 of List 11 of the Constitution. The State of Mysore had therefore no authority to levy and collect health cess on

M/s. Bombay Tyres International Ltd., Bombay and another Vs. K.S. Prak ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR1997Kant311; ILR1997KAR111; 1997(2)KarLJ1

the Supreme Court in Dhanapal Chettiar's case : [1980]1SCR334 ), ii was further held as follows (in paragraph 11 of the Judgment) :'Therefore, this authority clearly holds that ihc provisions of Rcm Control Act would apply notwithstanding … and reasonably require me entire petition schedule premises in the occupation of the tenants, which roughly measures about 12000 sq. ft. Each of the petitioners requires for each one of them about 6000 sq. ft. of accommodation

In Re: Cheminor Drugs Limited (Transferor Company) and Dr. Reddy's Lab ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2001(1)ALT636

Divisional Board or the State Board. The Divisional Board holds the examination and issues certificates after 10th and 12th standard examinations. The State Board advises the State Government on policy matters, ensures uniform pattern of secondary and

The Coimbatore District Aided Secondary and Higher Secondary School Ma ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2004(1)CTC81

C.M.P. Nos.5549 and 32136 of 1999 and 756 of 2000 are closed. Constitution - validity - Rules 3 and 12 of Tamil Nadu Recognised Private School (Regulations) Rules, 1974 - amendment made to Rule 3 whereby number of

Bishnoi K.K. Vs. Employees' State Insurance Corporation

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1995)IIILLJ865Cal

Matched in: Parties Bishnoi K.K. Vs. Employees' State Insurance Corporation (11.12.1995 - CALHC)

Mysore Kirloskar Employees' Association Vs. Industrial Tribunal, Banga ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR1959Kant235; AIR1959Mys235; ILR1959KAR135; (1959)ILLJ531Kant

it is incumbent upon the employer to prepare a draft which is in conformity with the model prescribed.' 11. This passage does not, however, support the extreme contention that it is incumbent on the employer to copy … it is up to the employer to satisfy him that it was impracticable to conform to the model. 12. The only real or stable difference occurs in this way. Section 4 states that it shall not be

The South India Cashewnut Manufactures' Association Vs. the Chief Secr ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: (1953)IILLJ563Ker

Labour Commissioner who, among others, had been appointed a conciliation officer by the following notification:-No. L2-7955/50/DD (1), dated 12 August 1950.Under Section 4 of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 (XIV of 1947), the Government of Travancore-Cochin are … the demand for bonus to the extent of 4 per cent of the total earnings for the year 1126. They were not for conceding any bonus for the previous year nor were they agreeable to any of

Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd. Vs. Aluminium Factory Workers' Union, Alwaye ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR1959Ker37; (1958)IILLJ403Ker

so it is not necessary to evaluate the reaction of that provision to the facts of this case. 11. The petition will stand disposed of as above. No costs. 12. We make it clear, as desired by