Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Union of India Vs. Bhole

Union of India vs Bhole

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided May 20, 1992
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/696683

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Regular First Appeal No. 310 of 1976
Subject
Property

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Property
Acts & sections
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 18

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Union of India

Advocate Sashi Kiran, Adv

Respondent

Bhole

Legal References

Acts
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 18
Reported In
47(1992)DLT303

Excerpt

- r.l. gupta, j.(1) this appeal is directed against judgment and decree dated 31.5.76 of learned additional district judge, delhi by which he enhanced compensation at the rate of rs. 4225.00 per bigha of land in block i, in block ii and rs. 1200.00 per bigha of land situated in block iii in respect of lands belonging to the respondent and situated within the revenue estate of village ali, union territory of delhi. this was done on a reference under section 18 of the land acquisition act (act for short) from the collector. there are no cross-objections filed by the respondent in this appeal.(2) in the case of acquisition of lands falling within the revenue estate of village ali, compensation payable to the land owners have been enhanced by this court in many appeals. thereforee, question of reduction in the compensation allowed by the learned additional district judge, delhi to the respondents does not arise. the appeal, thereforee, is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Full Judgment

R.L. Gupta, J.

(1) This appeal is directed against judgment and decree dated 31.5.76 of learned Additional District Judge, Delhi by which he enhanced compensation at the rate of Rs. 4225.00 per bigha of land in Block I, in Block Ii and Rs. 1200.00 per bigha of land situated in Block Iii in respect of lands belonging to the respondent and situated within the revenue estate of village Ali, Union Territory of Delhi. This was done on a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act (Act for short) from the Collector. There are no cross-objections filed by the respondent in this appeal.

(2) In the case of acquisition of lands falling within the revenue estate of village Ali, compensation payable to the land owners have been enhanced by this Court in many appeals. thereforee, question of reduction in the compensation allowed by the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi to the respondents does not arise. The appeal, thereforee, is dismissed with no order as to costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial