Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Munendra Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Munendra Kumar vs Union of India (Uoi)

Disposition Writ petition dismissed Court Delhi Decided Mar 15, 2002
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/687675

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CWP 125/2001
Subject
Service
Disposition
Writ petition dismissed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Law - Termination of service--Petitioner lower division clerk--Put on probation-Obtained without following the Recruitment rules--Appointment of the petitioner having been made in violation of the recruitment rules as also Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, was non--est in the eyes of law and e...

Key legal issue
Service
Outcome / disposition
Writ petition dismissed
Acts & sections
Recruitment Rules - Rule 5(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Munendra Kumar

Advocate H.C. Sharma, Adv

Respondent

Union of India (Uoi)

Advocate Manisha Dhir, Adv.

Legal References

Acts
Recruitment Rules - Rule 5(1); Constitution of India - Article 226
Reported In
2002(64)DRJ795

Excerpt

service law - termination of service--petitioner lower division clerk--put on probation-obtained without following the recruitment rules--appointment of the petitioner having been made in violation of the recruitment rules as also articles 14 and 16 of the constitution of india, was non--est in the eyes of law and even on that ground this court shall not exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under article 226--writ petition dismissed. - order consequent on his superannuation w.e.f 31 jul 98, shri pn sundaram, scientist 'g', director, sag, delhi, will handover the charge to shri dk garg, scientist 'f' of sag, delhi. shri garg will officiate as director, sag, delhi, till further orders. necessary handing/taking over may please be done accordingly.sd/- (dr. ram kumar) director of personnelfor director general research & development'13. the office order dated 30th november 2000 is in the following terms:'30 november, 2000 office

Full Judgment

ORDER

Consequent on his superannuation w.e.f 31 Jul 98, Shri PN Sundaram, Scientist 'G', Director, SAG, Delhi, will handover the charge to Shri DK Garg, Scientist 'F' of SAG, Delhi.

Shri Garg will officiate as Director, SAG, Delhi, till further orders.

Necessary Handing/Taking over may please be done accordingly.

Sd/-

(Dr. Ram Kumar)

Director of Personnel

For Director General Research & Development'

13. The Office Order dated 30th November 2000 is in the following terms:

'30 November, 2000

OFFICE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial