Advanced Search Results
Hargreaves Investments Ltd. Vs. the Appellate Authority for Industrial ...
Delhi
Jan-18-2008
SICA
Companies Act; Constitution of India - Article 226; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 273
147(2008)DLT175
Rajiv Nayyar, Sr. Adv. and ; Manisha Dhir, Adv. for respondent No. 3, ;
A.K. Sikri , J.1. The Petitioner has filed this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing the order dated 24th September 2007 passed by Appellate Authority...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKusum Ingots and Alloys Ltd. Vs. Aaif and ors.
Delhi
Oct-04-2004
SicaCivil
Constitution of India - Article 226; Sick Industrial Companies Act Act - Sections 16 and 17
26(2004)DLT115; (2005)139PLR1
Sumant Batra, Adv. for IFCI, ; Manisha Dhir, ; Preeti Dalal
Vijender Jain, J.1. Aggrieved by the order passed by the AAIFR dated 17.4.2001 the petitioner has filed the present writ petition. It was contended before us that the AAIFR has not taken into consideration the Report...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEx-ct. Satbir Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Sep-02-2005
Service
Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 - Sections 11(1); Central Reserve Police Force Rules, 1955 - Rule 27
123(2005)DLT681; 2005(84)DRJ57
Manisha Dhir, Adv.
Badar Durrez Ahmed, J. 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the penalty of 'removal from service meted out to him on 25.08.2000 as also the appellate order dated 05.12.2000 whereby his appeal against the order of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dig K.P.S. Raghuvanshi Vs. Union of India and ors.
Delhi
Sep-04-2014
Land Acquisition
Ms. Maneesha Dhir
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10726/2009 DIG K.P.S. RAGHUVANSHI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. B.P. Singh and Mr.Parma Nand, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: % ..... Respondents...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Daya Dua and ors. Vs. Official Liquidator and ors.
Delhi
May-05-2003
Service
Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226
2003IVAD(Delhi)365; 104(2003)DLT951; 2003(69)DRJ530; 2003(3)SLJ505(Delhi)
Harish Chandra, Sr. Adv., ; Akshay Makhija, ; Rajender Nisc
Vijender Jain, J. 1. A classic case of the respondents trying to wriggle out from the order passed by the Supreme Court of India. The petitioners have filed this writ petition, inter alia, praying that directions...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskL/Nk V.H.K. Murthy Vs. Special Protection Group and Another
Delhi
Jan-31-2000
Service
Constitution of India - Article 226
2000IVAD(Delhi)624; 2000(57)DRJ157
Ms. Geeta Luthra, ; Mr. J.K. Singh, ; Mr. A.K. Srivastava
ORDERA.K. Sikri, J.1. These 5 writ petitions raise same question of law. All these writ petitions were accordingly heard together and are disposed of by this common judgment. In order to appreciate the controversy, let me...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India and Others Vs. Datapro Information Technology Ltd.
Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT
Apr-15-2010
Land Acquisition
S.B. Sinha Both these petitions being inter-related were taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this judgment. The fact of the matter is as under. The Datapro Information Technology Ltd., (hereinafter called...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCellular Operators Association of India and Others Vs. Department of T ...
Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT
Jun-03-2011
Service Tax
S.B. Sinha By an order dated 18.5.2011, an interim order was passed in favour of the petitioners on the following conditions :- “(i) The operators shall pay the penalty at the same rate which they have...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRatul Puri vs.punjab National Bank
Delhi
Mar-17-2017
Land Acquisition
Mr. Sartaj Singh
$~25. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2464/2017 and CM APPL. 10630-32/2017 1. RATUL PURI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Parag Tripathi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rishi Agarwala, Ms. Manisha Dhir,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: the Companies Act, 1956; in Re: Petition Under Sections 391-394 ...
Delhi
Sep-30-2008
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 78(1), 78(2), 78, 79, 79A, 100 to 105, 189, 189(2), 205(2), 205(2A), 205A, 205A(3), 235 to 251, 391 to 394 and 642(1); Companies(Amendment) Act, 1974; English Companies Act, 1948 - Sections 56; Indian Companies Act, 1913; Finance Act (2), 1957; Companies (Transfer of Profits to Reserve) Rules, 1975; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 85; Companies (Declaration of Dividends out of Reserves) Rules, 1975 - Rule 2
[2009]147CompCas712(Delhi); [2009]89SCL454(Delhi)
Vipin Sanghi, J.1. This petition under Section 391 -394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as Act) has been filed by the petitioner Nestle India Ltd. to obtain the sanction and approval to the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »