Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

K.N. Sreenivasan Vs. Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Headquarters, Kochi and ors.

K.N. Sreenivasan vs Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Headquarters, Kochi and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Supreme Court of India Decided Sep 08, 1994
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/671721

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Supreme Court of India
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Service

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- [P.B. Sawant and; S.C. Agrawal, JJ.] - When the incumbent of the said post, viz., Shri Pillai retired on 31-1-1991, the post fell vacant. If no individual from the reserved category is available, then the procedure to be followed is to convert the post into a non-reserved post and offer the same to the candidate ...

Key legal issue
Service

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

K.N. Sreenivasan

Respondent

Flag Officer Commanding-in-chief, Headquarters, Kochi and ors.

Legal References

Reported In
(1996)7SCC73; 1996(32)ATC782; 1995(8)SLR548; 1996SCC(L&S)460

Excerpt

- [p.b. sawant and; s.c. agrawal, jj.] - when the incumbent of the said post, viz., shri pillai retired on 31-1-1991, the post fell vacant. if no individual from the reserved category is available, then the procedure to be followed is to convert the post into a non-reserved post and offer the same to the candidate from the non-reserved category and carry forward the post for the reserved category for which it was meant if the carry forward rule existed and so permits. in the present case, this is the second time when the reserved post was carried forward for the scheduled castes......was available. there is nothing on record to show that if a schedule caste candidate is not available, the rule requires that the post should be offered to either a schedule tribe or an obc candidate. nor is there any material to show that even if such a rule existed, candidates from the said two categories were available to be appointed. on the other hand, both the said letter as well as the counter show that the stand taken by the respondents was that the said post would remain vacant and in fact it has remained vacant because no scheduled caste candidate was available. we are unable to understand the reasoning of the respondents. if no individual from the reserved category is available, then the procedure to be followed is to convert the post into a non-reserved post and offer the same to the candidate from the non-reserved category and carry forward the post for the reserved category for which it was meant if the carry forward rule existed and so permits3. in the present case, this is the second time when the reserved post was carried forward for the scheduled castes. hence the post has to be converted into a non-reserved post an offered to the appellant who even as per the counter filed on behalf of the respondent is qualified to be appointed to the same. since it is only the second time when the post was carried forward for the scheduled castes, the same can be carried forward for the said category for the third time if the carry forward rule permits4. we, therefore, direct the respondent to consider the appellant for appointment to the said post of senior foreman, grade i and if he is qualified, appoint him within four weeks from today. the appeals are allowed accordingly, with no order as to costs.

Full Judgment

P.B. Sawant and; S.C. Agrawal, JJ.

1. We have heard learned counsel and have gone through the record

2. It appears from the letter dated 16-3-1991 addressed by the Commanding Manager (Administration) to the appellant as well as from the counter filed by one Commander Khanna. Chief Staff Officer in July 1993 in reply to this appeal, that there was a roster maintained for promotion to the post of the Senior Foreman, Grade I. When the incumbent of the said post, viz., Shri Pillai retired on 31-1-1991, the post fell vacant. At this stage, according to the roster, it was the turn of a Scheduled Caste candidate to fill in the post by promotion. However, no Scheduled Caste candidate was available. There is nothing on record to show that if a Schedule Caste candidate is not available, the rule requires that the post should be offered to either a Schedule Tribe or an OBC candidate. Nor is there any material to show that even if such a rule existed, candidates from the said two categories were available to be appointed. On the other hand, both the said letter as well as the counter show that the stand taken by the respondents was that the said post would remain vacant and in fact it has remained vacant because no Scheduled Caste candidate was available. We are unable to understand the reasoning of the respondents. If no individual from the reserved category is available, then the procedure to be followed is to convert the post into a non-reserved post and offer the same to the candidate from the non-reserved category and carry forward the post for the reserved category for which it was meant if the carry forward rule existed and so permits

3. In the present case, this is the second time when the reserved post was carried forward for the Scheduled Castes. Hence the post has to be converted into a non-reserved post an offered to the appellant who even as per the counter filed on behalf of the respondent is qualified to be appointed to the same. Since it is only the second time when the post was carried forward for the Scheduled Castes, the same can be carried forward for the said category for the third time if the carry forward rule permits4. We, therefore, direct the respondent to consider the appellant for appointment to the said post of Senior Foreman, Grade I and if he is qualified, appoint him within four weeks from today. The appeals are allowed accordingly, with no order as to costs.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial