Smt. Ananthamma Vs. the Managing Director, Co-operative Spinning Mills Limited, Raichur

Smt. Ananthamma vs The Managing Director, Co-operative Spinning Mills Limited, Raichur

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Aug 04, 1998

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/372265

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/372265
Court: Karnataka High Court
Judge: Mohamed Anwar, J.
Decided On: Aug 04, 1998
Case Number: Miscellaneous First Appeal No. 1871 of 1987
Subject: Labour and Industrial

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- KARNATAKA TRANSPARENCY IN PUBLICPROCUREMENTS ACT, 1999.[K.A. No. 29/2000]. Section 9: [Anand Byareddy, J]Tender for establishing State-wide Area Network - Constitution of Tenders Accepting Authority Multi-Member Committee (NSC) appointed for procurement entity discharging function to examine recommendations recei...

Key legal issue: Labour and Industrial
Acts & sections: Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Section3(1)

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Smt. Ananthamma

Advocate Sri R.A. Shiraguppi, Adv.

Respondent

The Managing Director, Co-operative Spinning Mills Limited, Raichur

Advocate Sri B.C. Prabhakar, Adv.

Legal References

Acts: Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Section3(1)
Reported In: I(1999)ACC328; 2000ACJ166; [1999(81)FLR260]; 1999(1)KarLJ356; (1999)ILLJ1053Kant

Excerpt

- karnataka transparency in publicprocurements act, 1999.[k.a. no. 29/2000]. section 9: [anand byareddy, j]tender for establishing state-wide area network - constitution of tenders accepting authority multi-member committee (nsc) appointed for procurement entity discharging function to examine recommendations received from governments consultants received from governments consultants on implementation of state wide area network (kswan), to consider-recommendations of consultant on preparation of tender documents and detailed evaluation criterion in respect of same as well as to examine selection of bidder nsc also discharged function to recommend to government final bidder for network held, such committee shall be deemed to be tender accepting authority. appointment of technical sub-committee in tender security committee employs a vigilant circumspection and care. it cannot be said that it was a whimsical or mala fide action to discredit or disqualify any tenderer. - on the other hand the circumstances in which the deceased breathed his last are clearly indicative of the fact that he died of heart failure......act, 1923 ('the act' for short).2. it is not in dispute that appellant's husband late ramulu was employed and was working as a realer in the spinning mill of respondent 1, on 8-12-1979 at 8,45 a.m. when he was attending his work as such in the factory premises his co-worker [ ramesh ] s/o bhaskar heard voice of the deceased saying 'ham'. then, suresh sensed the danger in the health condition of the deceased. therefore, with the permission of the in charge shift officer of respondent 1-factory, he took the deceased along with him to the city bus stop at hubli to take him to the hospital. while they were waiting for a bus at the said bus-stop, the deceased once again gasped his breath saying 'ham' and collapsed there. thereafter, appellant gave an application to the commissioner for grant of compensation.3. during enquiry, the statements of suresh and of the claimants were recorded by the commissioner. the defence of respondent-employer before the commissioner was that the death of the deceased was not due to any injury caused to him during the course of the employment.4. in the light of relevant material brought on record during enquiry, the defence of respondent 1 was upheld by the commissioner and the claimant's application was rejected by him by his impugned order.5. indisputedly, there is not an iota of material placed on record from the claimant's side even remotely suggesting that any injury of whatever nature was caused to the workman ramulu while he was attending his duty in respondent 1-factory, much less, the personal injury resulting in his death. section 3 of the act creates liability of the employer for payment of compensation to his workman in respect of the injury caused to him in the course of the employment. the material portion thereof reads.-''3. employer's liability for compensation.- (1) if personal injury is caused to a workman by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment, his employer shall be liable to pay compensation.....

Full Judgment

1. Appellant is the widow of the deceased Ramulu, who has preferred this appeal against the order of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation dated 14-11-1985 made in Case No. WCA/F-4/81-82 dismissing her application for grant of compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 ('the Act' for short).

2. It is not in dispute that appellant's husband late Ramulu was employed and was working as a Realer in the Spinning Mill of respondent 1, On 8-12-1979 at 8,45 a.m. when he was attending his work as such in the factory premises his co-worker [ Ramesh ] S/o Bhaskar heard voice of the deceased saying 'Ham'. Then, Suresh sensed the danger in the health condition of the deceased. Therefore, with the permission of the in charge shift officer of respondent 1-factory, he took the deceased along with him to the City bus stop at Hubli to take him to the Hospital. While they were waiting for a bus at the said bus-stop, the deceased once again gasped his breath saying 'Ham' and collapsed there. Thereafter, appellant gave an application to the Commissioner for grant of compensation.

3. During enquiry, the statements of Suresh and of the claimants were recorded by the Commissioner. The defence of respondent-employer before the Commissioner was that the death of the deceased was not due to any injury caused to him during the course of the employment.

4. In the light of relevant material brought on record during enquiry, the defence of respondent 1 was upheld by the Commissioner and the claimant's application was rejected by him by his impugned order.

5. Indisputedly, there is not an iota of material placed on record from the claimant's side even remotely suggesting that any injury of whatever nature was caused to the workman Ramulu while he was attending his duty in respondent 1-factory, much less, the personal injury resulting in his death. Section 3 of the Act creates liability of the employer for payment of compensation to his workman in respect of the injury caused to him in the course of the employment. The material portion thereof reads.-

''3. Employer's liability for compensation.-

(1) If personal injury is caused to a workman by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment, his employer shall be liable to pay compensation in accordance with the provisions of this chapter:

Provided that. . . . .',

The plain reading of this material provision sub-section (3) makes it crystal clear that an employer's liability to pay compensation to a work-man arises only if the personal injury is caused to the workman by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. In the instant case it is nobody's case that any personal injury was caused to the deceased or that any injury was caused by an accident occurred while he was discharging his duty in the course of his employment. On the other hand the circumstances in which the deceased breathed his last are clearly indicative of the fact that he died of heart failure. Therefore, no fault could be found with the impugned order of the Commissioner.

6. Hence, the appeal is dismissed.

Parties to bear their own costs.

Same Court & Year Karnataka · 1998 Same Parties Smt. Ananthamma vs The Managing Director, Co-operative Spinni... Same Subject Labour and Industrial Same Judge Mohamed Anwar, J. Acts & Sections Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Section3(1)

Labour and Industrial