Workmen S Compensation Act - Judgment Search Results

Amna Devi Vs. Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation Act, Hisar and Anot ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Kuldip Singh, J. (Oral) Respondent No. 1-Commissioner under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, Hisar Circle, Hisar, had passed the impugned order dated 9.3.1992. Therefore, service of respondent No. 1 is

Asstt. Engineer (Dsd West) RSEB Vs. Commissioner, Workmen's Compensati ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 2(2000)ACC717; 2000(1)WLC102

the appellant on the ground that Bal Gopal Sharma was not a workman with the meaning of Workmen's Compensation Act and that he died on Sunday while he was not discharging the duties. However, the Compensation Commissioner rejecting

Param Dev Vs. Commissioner under Workmen's Compensation Act

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: (1999)IIILLJ291HP

position to do any work. The case of the petitioner was reported to the Commissioner under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter to be called as 'the Act') by respondent No. 2, who after recording the evidence made

Joginder Singh Vs. Commissioner under Workmen's Compensation Act

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: (1999)IIILLJ465J& K

order dated June 25, 1990 on the plea of jurisdiction in terms of Section 21 of the Workmen's Compensation Act. He is in appeal to assail the order on the ground that since he resided at Jammu along

Ramlal Son of Mohanlal Maraskolhe Vs. the Commissioner Workmen's Compe ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1989(59)FLR61]; (1993)IIILLJ33Bom

compensation to be paid to the legal heir on 12th October 1984 with the Commissioner, under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (the Act). Sole legal heir of Ratulabai-her younger brother Ramlal, the petitioner - filed an application under

Ramlal Vs. the Commissioner Workmen's Compensation Act and Ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1(1989)ACC296

compensation to be paid to the legal heir on 12th October 1984 with the Commissioner, under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (the Act). Sole legal heir of Ratulabai, her younger brother Ramlal, the petitioner filed an application under

Mohinder Singh Vs. Commissioner Under Workmen's Compensation Act and O ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 2(1993)ACC132

Constitution of India for quashing the order dated 29th October, 1987 passed by the Commissioner under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (for short 'the Act') and for a further direction to decide the Claim of the petitioner on

R.B. Raghunath Singh and Co. Vs. Commissioner under Workmen's Compensa ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: (1960)ILLJ598AP

M.A. Ansari, J.1. This is under Section 30 of the Indian Workmen's Compensation Act, and the appellant seeks to vary the Commissioner's award allowing the widow Rs. 1,800 due to her husband's

Brij Lal Vs. Commissioner Under the Workmen's Compensation Act and Ors ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 2008ACJ2168; [2007(114)FLR392]; (2007)146PLR489

the well on the land owned by the petitioner, his legal representatives filed an application under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (for short 'the Act') before the Commissioner under the Act. The learned Commissioner passed an order on

Present:- Mr. Lokesh Sinhal Advocate Vs. Commissioner under the Workme ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

of decision: July 29, 2013 M/s Synergic Medical International, Sector 14, Gurgaon ......Petitioner Versus Commissioner under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, Circle 3, Gurgaon and another .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr.Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate for the