Preethi vs Akhil

Preethi vs AKHIL

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Mar 17, 2020

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1734692

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1734692
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice Ashok Menon
Decided On: Mar 17, 2020
Case Number: Crl.MC/655/2020

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Preethi

Respondent

AKHIL

Excerpt

.....paringadan house, pullathara, kizhuthani desom, karlam village, mukundapuram taluk, by adv. sri.rajesh chakyat respondent/complainant: 1 akhil aged 32 years s/o. sankaran, mulla house, veluppadam p.o., varandarappilly village, thrissur-680 303. 2 the sub inspector of police, varandarappilly police station, thrissur district, rep by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala 682 031. r1 by adv. biju .c. abraham ssri.c.s.hrithwik sr pp this criminal misc. case having come up for admission on 17.03.2020, the court on the same day passed the following:orderdated this the 17th day of march 2020 there was an order made by this court on09.03.2020, directing the 1st petitioner to surrender before the court below. but now the learned counsel appearing for the petitionerssubmits that, it is not the 1st petitioner, but the 2nd petitioner against whom warrant is pending. a mistake has crept in the petition to the effect that the 1st petitioner was abroad in connection with his employment. under the circumstances, the petitioners are not pressing this petition, and intend to file a separate petition.the crl.m.c is therefore, dismissed as not pressed with liberty. the original documents produced by the petitioners shall be returned to them on proper application. sd/- ashok menon judge spk appendix petitioner's/s exhibits: annexure 1 certified copy of the final report in crkme no.113/2017 dated 30.1.2018. annexure 2 original copy of the compounding affidavit executed by the ist respondent/injured/cw1 dated 18.1.2020. respondent's/s exhibits: nil //true copy// pa to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK MENON TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH 2020 / 27TH PHALGUNA, 1941 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN SC 238/2019 OF PRINCIPAL ASSISTANT SESSIONS COURT,IRINJALAKUDA AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CP 12/2019 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS ,IRINJALAKUDA PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1, 2 AND 4: 1 PREETHI, AGED 40 YEARS S/O. MOHANAN, ARANDAN HOSUE, PANCHIKARAN MOOLA, VARANDARAPPILLY VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. 2 AKHIL , AGED 26 YEARS S/O. VISWAMBARAN, THALIYAKKAL HOSUE, VELUPADAM, KALAVARAKUNNU DESOM, VARANDARAPPILLY, 3 NIDISH @ PAKRU , AGED 26 YEARS S/O. SASIDHARAN, PARINGADAN HOUSE, PULLATHARA, KIZHUTHANI DESOM, KARLAM VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, BY ADV. SRI.RAJESH CHAKYAT RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT: 1 AKHIL AGED 32 YEARS S/O. SANKARAN, MULLA HOUSE, VELUPPADAM P.O., VARANDARAPPILLY VILLAGE, THRISSUR-680 303. 2 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VARANDARAPPILLY POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT, REP BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA 682 031. R1 BY ADV. BIJU .C. ABRAHAM SSRI.C.S.HRITHWIK SR PP THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17.03.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Dated this the 17th day of March 2020 There was an order made by this Court on

09.03.2020,          directing       the        1st    petitioner          to
surrender      before       the    court       below.       But    now    the
learned     counsel         appearing          for    the     petitioners

submits that, it is not the 1st petitioner, but the 2nd petitioner against whom warrant is pending. A mistake has crept in the petition to the effect that the 1st petitioner was abroad in connection with his employment. Under the circumstances, the petitioners are not pressing this petition, and intend to file a separate petition.

The Crl.M.C is therefore, dismissed as not pressed with liberty. The original documents produced by the petitioners shall be returned to them on proper application. Sd/- ASHOK MENON JUDGE SPK APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: ANNEXURE 1 CERTIFIED COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CRKME NO.113/2017 DATED 30.1.2018. ANNEXURE 2 ORIGINAL COPY OF THE COMPOUNDING AFFIDAVIT EXECUTED BY THE IST RESPONDENT/INJURED/CW1 DATED 18.1.2020. RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2020 Same Parties Preethi vs AKHIL Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice Ashok Menon

In connection with Public prosecutor Certified copy Police Station First class high court True copy