Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Nepoleon Vs The Divisional Engineer

Nepoleon vs The Divisional Engineer

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jun 29, 2026
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1660627

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(MD)/18191/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nepoleon

Respondent

The Divisional Engineer

Excerpt

.....itself.4. the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitionerhad made an online application along with the requisite fee on 16.04.2026 seeking electricity connection for his house. since no action was taken by the respondents, the petitioner submitted a detailed representation dated 30.04.2026. however, as the said representation has also not been considered till date, the petitioner has been constrained to approach this court by filing the present writ petition.5. the learned counsel further submitted that it would suffice if thiscourt issues a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 30.04.2026 and pass appropriate orders thereon within a time frame to be fixed by this court.6. considering the above facts and circumstances of the case andwithout going into the merits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents, to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 30.04.2026 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law. such exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. no costs. 29.06.2026 ncc : yes / no index : yes / no internet : yes pkn to1. the divisional engineer, tangedco, kezha muttom village, eranial,2. the assistant engineer, tangedco, kezha muttom village, eranial,m.dhandapani,j.pknorder made indated : 29.06.2026

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.06.2026

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Nepoleon ... Petitioner(s) vs.

1. The Divisional Engineer, Tangedco, Kezha Muttom Village, Eranial,

2. The Assistant Engineer,

Tangedco, Kezha Muttom Village, Eranial, Kanniyakumari District. ... Respondent(s) PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to give Electricity Service Connection to the petitioners house in Door No.15/2 in Ice Plant Street, Kezha Muttam Village, Kurunthankodu, Kanniyakumari District based on house tax receipts and without insisting the patta or title deed within the period that may be stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr. V.G.Vallarasu Chezhiyan For R1 & R2 : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan, Standing Counsel

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to provide electricity service connection to the petitioner’s house bearing Door No.15/2, Ice Plant Street, Kezha Muttam Village, Kurunthankodu, Kanniyakumari District, based on house tax receipts and without insisting upon patta or title deed, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2. Heard Mr.V.G.Vallarasu Chezhiyan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.Deenadhayalan, learned Standing Counsel, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2.

3. By consent of both parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner

had made an online application along with the requisite fee on 16.04.2026 seeking electricity connection for his house. Since no action was taken by the respondents, the petitioner submitted a detailed representation dated 30.04.2026. However, as the said representation has also not been considered till date, the petitioner has been constrained to approach this Court by filing the present writ petition.

5. The learned counsel further submitted that it would suffice if this

Court issues a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 30.04.2026 and pass appropriate orders thereon within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

6. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and

without going into the merits of the case, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents, to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 30.04.2026 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law. Such exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 29.06.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes PKN To

1. The Divisional Engineer, Tangedco, Kezha Muttom Village, Eranial,

2. The Assistant Engineer, Tangedco, Kezha Muttom Village, Eranial,

M.DHANDAPANI,J.

PKN

ORDER MADE IN

DATED : 29.06.2026

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial