Ice Plant - Judgment Search Results
Kairali Ice Plant vs the Assistant Commissioner
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Dec-08-2023
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 17TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945 PETITIONER: KAIRALI ICE PLANT KURUPPATH, KONDOTTY, MALAPPURAM - 673 638 REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR AYSHABI T, AGED 62 YEARS, W/O.MOIDEEN KOYA, PALLIKKAL
Yemkay Ice Plant Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Aug-31-2005
Reported in: 2006(1)KLT690
C.N. Ramachandran Nair, J.1. The petitioners who are ice plant owners are questioning the constitutional validity of Section 4(5B) of the Keraia Fishermen's Welfare Fund Act 1985, hereinafter … fishermen as their employees, Section 4(5B) ofthe Kerala Fishermen's Welfare Fund Act, providing for collection of contributionfrom the ice plant owners is unconstitutional by virtue of the decision of the SupremeCourt referred above. In the circumstances, Section 4(5B)
Anand K.Nair @ Anandakuttan vs M/S.Modern Dairy and Ice Plant
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-27-2024
APPELLANT/PETITIONER: ANAND K.NAIR @ ANANDAKUTTAN S/O.GOPALAKAIMAL, KAITHAPARAMBU, THEKKEKARA,MANCOMPU,ALAPPUZHA. BY ADVS. SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN SMT.S.INDU RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: 1 M/S.MODERN DAIRY AND ICE PLANT HIRAPUR ROAD, CHALISGAON, JALGAON DIST. 2 SHEIK ISMAIL SHEIKNIJAM CHALISGOAK, D.V.RAOD, PATNA. 3 THE MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.,
18-section briefs on any result in this list
M/s. R.V. Ice Plant Vs The Superintending Engineer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-11-2026
COURT DATED: 11-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR WP(MD) No.15969 of 2026 and W.M.P(MD)No 11964 of 2026 M/s. R.V. Ice Plant, Represented by its Proprietor, G. Arulraj .. Petitioner - Vs. -1. The Superintending Engineer, Distribution Circle,2. The Executive … deposit of 40% of the outstanding amount, the respondents shall restore the electricity service connection to the petitioner’s ice plant, namely, “R.V. Ice Plant”.6. In the event of default in payment of any monthly instalment, therespondents are at
M/s.Follow Jesus Ice Plant Vs The Tamilnadu Pollution Control Board
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jun-03-2026
BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03-06-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR W.P(MD) No. 11405 of 2026 M/s.Follow Jesus Ice Plant, Rep by its Proprietor, Shajan, No.1-1-405 (Near the Church), Eraviputhenthurai, Thoottoor Post Office, Kanyakumari District. ... Petitioner - … Mandamus directing the respondents to pass appropriate order to restore power supply to the petitioner's unit M/s.Follow Jesus Ice plant situated in No.1-1-405(Near the Church), Eraviputhenthurai, Thoottoor Post Office, Kanyakumari District, based on the petitioner's representation dated 11.04.2026
A.C. Moideen Kutty Vs. Richardson and Cruddas and Co., Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-09-1970
Reported in: (1971)3SCC967
The claim was valued in the plaint at Rs 17,488-4-6 - Rs 16,488-4-6 being the value of the ice plant and Rs 1,000 being the amount of damages. The trial court decreed the suit and awarded to the … amount of damages. The trial court decreed the suit and awarded to the plaintiff the value of the ice plant and Rs 13,110-0-0 as damages. In appeal to the High Court the decree of the trial court was
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Everest Cold Storage
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-16-1996
Reported in: (1996)134CTR(MP)473; [1996]220ITR241(MP)
allowance on the ice manufacturing plant, since a combined account of the cold storage as well as the ice plant was maintained, it was not possible to ascertain the exact amount for giving the benefit of investment allowance … manufacturing plant under Section 32A of the Act, but at the same time the Commissioner has held that ice plant is a manufacturing unit and is entitled to be given investment allowance under Section 32A of the Act.
S. Pathrose Vs. State of Kerala and ors.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jun-27-1996
Reported in: AIR1997Ker48
interference from the fifth respondent-President of Anehuthengu Muslim Juma Ath during the construction of the building. The proposed ice plant and the mosque are situated on the opposite sides of the road. When there was interference by the … was found that there is every likelihood of Juma Ath being polluted by dirty water from the proposed ice plant and also the entire atmosphere will be polluted with foul smell of fish. This may create difficulties, for
M/S. Shyam Cold Storage, Shahjahanpur Vs. Sales Tax Officer, Shahjahan ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-15-1975
Reported in: (1976)5CTR(All)58
giving other particulars required in the form, the petitioner mentioned compressor and parts, Ammonia receiver, full machinery of Ice-candy and Ice-plant, Ammonia pipe and Ammonia cylinder for the manufacture and sale of Ice and cream. As respect
Shyam Cold Storage Vs. Sales Tax Officer
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-15-1975
Reported in: [1976]38STC386(All)
giving other particulars required in the form, the petitioner mentioned compressor and parts, ammonia receiver, full machinery of ice-candy and ice-plant, ammonia pipe and ammonia cylinder for the manufacture and sale of ice and ice-cream.2. As respect
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free