Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bhimashankar vs Special Land Acquisition Officer and Ors

Bhimashankar vs Special Land Acquisition Officer and Ors

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Kalaburagi Decided Feb 28, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1635895

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Kalaburagi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
MFA/201921/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bhimashankar

Respondent

Special Land Acquisition Officer and Ors

Excerpt

.....on the file of iii addl civil judge (sr.dn) kalaburagi and pleased to modify the allowing the appeal by enhancing the compensation and etc. -2- this appeal, coming on for orders, this day,judgment was delivered therein as under:coram: hon'ble mr justice s.sunil dutt yadav and hon'ble mr justice rajesh rai koral judgment(per: hon'ble mr justice s.sunil dutt yadav) memo for withdrawal of appeal is filed which reads as hereunder: “in the above appeal there is filed challenging thejudgment and award dated 09-04-2008 in lacno.521/1999 passed by the iiird addl., civil judge (sr.dn), kalaburagi. the appellant does not want proceed with the above appeal. hence, it is prayed to this hon’ble court kindly permit the appellant to withdraw the above appeal as not pressed and the court fee paid by the appellant kindly be refunded, in the interest of justice and equity.”2. in light of the same, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn. there shall be refund of court fee as per applicable rules. -3- liberty is reserved to raise contentions against the impugned order, if circumstances are so made out subsequently. (s.sunil dutt yadav) (rajesh rai k) msr list no.: 1 sl no.: 16 ct: ps

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K MISCL. FIRST APPEAL NO. 201921 OF 2022 (LAC) BETWEEN: BHIMASHANKAR S/O CHANDRASHEKHAR BILGUNDI, AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE & BUSINESS, R/O KALABURAGI - 585102. …APPELLANT (BY SRI DEEPAK V BARAD, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND ASST. COMMISSIONER, KALABURAGI - 585102.

2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

Digitally signed KALABURAGI, DIST: KALABURAGI - 585102. by RAMESH MATHAPATI Location: HIGH 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER COURT OF KARNATAKA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, DIVISION, KALABURAGI - 585102. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SHIVAKUMAR TENGLI, AGA) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 54(1) OF L.A ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 09.04.2008 IN LAC NO. 521/1999 ON THE FILE OF III ADDL CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) KALABURAGI AND PLEASED TO MODIFY THE ALLOWING THE APPEAL BY ENHANCING THE COMPENSATION AND ETC. -2- THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV AND HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) Memo for withdrawal of appeal is filed which reads as hereunder: “In the above appeal there is filed challenging the

judgment and award dated 09-04-2008 in LAC

No.521/1999 passed by the IIIrd Addl., Civil Judge (Sr.Dn), Kalaburagi. The appellant does not want proceed with the above appeal. Hence, it is prayed to this Hon’ble Court kindly permit the appellant to withdraw the above appeal as not pressed and the Court fee paid by the appellant kindly be refunded, in the interest of justice and equity.”

2. In light of the same, the appeal is dismissed as

withdrawn. There shall be refund of Court fee as per applicable rules. -3- Liberty is reserved to raise contentions against the impugned order, if circumstances are so made out subsequently. (S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV) (RAJESH RAI K) MSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16 CT: PS

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial