Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shoukathali vs the State of Kerala

Shoukathali vs The State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Mar 30, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1615758

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/6083/2021

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shoukathali

Respondent

The State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice sathish ninan tuesday, the 30th day of march 2021 / 9th chaithra, 1943 wp(c).no.6083 of 2021(i) petitioner/s: shoukathali,aged 48 years s/o. mohammed, palampadiyan kondappurath house, vellila post, malappuram district. by adv. sri.k.rakesh respondent/s: 1 the state of kerala represented by its secretary, department of public works, government secretariat, trivandrum, pin-695 001. 2 the assistant engineer pwd (roads) office of the assistant engineer, melattur p.o., malappuram district, pin-679 326. 3 the executive engineer, pwd (roads) manjeri p.o., malappuram district, pin-676 121. 4 the manakada grama panchayath represented by its secretary, mankada p.o., malappuram district, pin-679 324. 5 the secretary,manakada grama panchayath mankada p.o., malappuram district, pin-679 324. 6 the joint regional transport authority represented by its secretary, perinthalmanna p.o., malappuram district, pin-679 322. gp: sri.paul abraham vakkanal this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 30.03.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following: wp(c).no.6083 of 2021(i) 2judgmentmemo recorded. writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- sathish ninan judge sd wp(c).no.6083 of 2021(i) 3 appendix petitioner's/s exhibits: exhibit p1 true copy of the complaint filed by the wife of the petitioner for and on behalf of the petitioenr before the 5th respondent dated 20.10.2020.exhibit p2 true copy of the receipt issued from the office of the 5th respondent dated, 21.10.2021. exhibit p3 true copy of the letter issued by the 5th respondent to the 3rd respondent dated 10.11.2020. exhibit p4 true copy of the order dated 7.1.2021 passed by the 2nd respondent and the plan appended therewith. exhibit p5 true copy of the receipt issued from the office of the 5th respondent for the complaint dated, 4.3.2021.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 9TH CHAITHRA, 1943 WP(C).No.6083 OF 2021(I) PETITIONER/S: SHOUKATHALI,AGED 48 YEARS S/O. MOHAMMED, PALAMPADIYAN KONDAPPURATH HOUSE, VELLILA POST, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.RAKESH RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM, PIN-695 001. 2 THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER PWD (ROADS) OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, MELATTUR P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-679 326. 3 THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD (ROADS) MANJERI P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676 121. 4 THE MANAKADA GRAMA PANCHAYATH REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MANKADA P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-679 324. 5 THE SECRETARY,MANAKADA GRAMA PANCHAYATH MANKADA P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-679 324. 6 THE JOINT REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PERINTHALMANNA P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-679 322. GP: SRI.PAUL ABRAHAM VAKKANAL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No.6083 OF 2021(I) 2

JUDGMENT

Memo recorded. Writ Petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- SATHISH NINAN JUDGE sd WP(C).No.6083 OF 2021(I) 3 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE WIFE OF THE PETITIONER FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIOENR BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED 20.10.2020.

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED, 21.10.2021. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 10.11.2020. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 7.1.2021 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT AND THE PLAN APPENDED THEREWITH. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT FOR THE COMPLAINT DATED, 4.3.2021.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial