Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Port Authority - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 12 2025

Paradip Port Authority versus Paradeep Phosphates Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-12-2025

Reported in: [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1695

[2025] 8 S.C.R. 1695 : 2025 INSC 971 Paradip Port Authority v. Paradeep Phosphates Ltd. (Civil Appeal No. 10542 of 2025) 12 August 2025 [M.M. Sundresh and Rajesh Bindal,* … 2025 [M.M. Sundresh and Rajesh Bindal,* JJ.]Issue for ConsiderationThe issue pertains to fixation of tariff by the Paradip Port Authority (Earlier Paradip Port Trust). Whether it would be appropriate if an expert appellate body is constituted to hear


Jan 20 2026

The Chennai Port Authority vs the Great Eastern Shipping Company Ltd

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-20-2026

AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN AND CMP No.17280 OF 2023 & CMP No. 17275 OF 20231. The Chennai Port Authority Rep by its Chairman, 1 Rajaji Salai, Chennai 12. The Deputy Chairperson,Chennai Port Authority, 1 Rajaji Salai, Chennai … OF 20231. The Chennai Port Authority Rep by its Chairman, 1 Rajaji Salai, Chennai 12. The Deputy Chairperson,Chennai Port Authority, 1 Rajaji Salai, Chennai 13. Senior Deputy Chief Accounts Officer (Revenue) Chennai Port Authority, 1 Rajaji Salai, Chennai


Apr 30 1990

Port Authority Vs. Feeney

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-30-1990

Port Authority v. Feeney - 495 U.S. 299 (1990) U.S. Supreme Court Port Authority v. Feeney, 495 U.S. 299 (1990) … Port Authority v. Feeney - 495 U.S. 299 (1990) U.S. Supreme Court Port Authority v. Feeney, 495 U.S. 299 (1990) Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp. v. Feeney No. 89-386 Argued Feb. 26, 1990


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 14 1994

Hess Vs. Port Authority Trans-hudson Corporation

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Nov-14-1994

Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation - 513 U.S. 30 (1994) OCTOBER TERM, 1994 Syllabus HESS ET AL. v. PORT AUTHORITY TRANS-HUDSON … v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation - 513 U.S. 30 (1994) OCTOBER TERM, 1994 Syllabus HESS ET AL. v. PORT AUTHORITY TRANS-HUDSON CORPORATION CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 93-1197. Argued October


Jan 27 2026

G.S. Express Pvt. Ltd. vs Land Port Authority of India

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-27-2026

27.01.2026 + ARB.P. 2049/2025 G.S. EXPRESS PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Khandelwal and Mr. Chirag Sharma, Advocates.versusLAND PORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Siddharth, Mr. Harshit Manwani, Ms. Himanshi Girdhar and Mr. Deepanshu Grover, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR.


Jun 13 2023

Susan Varghese, vs Cochin Port Authority,

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jun-13-2023

1945 WP(C) NO. 13036 OF 2023 PETITIONER: SUSAN VARGHESE, AGED 59 YEARS W/O.P.G.JAMES, ASSISTANT SECRETARY GR.I (OL), COCHIN PORT AUTHORITY, HINDI SECTION, GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, W/ISLAND, COCHIN, ERNAKULAM 682009 RESIDING AT JES VILLA, 30/1419- D, NAVAMI GARDENS, PONNURUNNI, … ADVS. KALEESWARAM RAJ THULASI K. RAJ APARNA NARAYAN MENON CHINNU MARIA ANTONY SILPA SREEKUMAR MANJIMA RESPONDENTS: 1 COCHIN PORT AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN, COCHIN PORT AUTHORITY WILLINGTON ISLAND, KOCHI-682009, PIN - 682 009. 2 BOARD OF AUTHORITIES


Jun 06 2023

Alfred Swatzar K.M vs Cochin Port Authority Represented by Estate Mana ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jun-06-2023

MANGALAM MULAVUKAD. P.O , ERNAKULAM - PIN 682504 PH. 8547416119, PIN - BY ADV T.B.MINI RESPONDENT/S: 1 COCHIN PORT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ESTATE MANAGER COCHIN PORT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ESTATE MANAGER WILINGTON ISLAND, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682003, PIN … 682504 PH. 8547416119, PIN - BY ADV T.B.MINI RESPONDENT/S: 1 COCHIN PORT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ESTATE MANAGER COCHIN PORT AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ESTATE MANAGER WILINGTON ISLAND, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682003, PIN - 2 DISTRICT COLLECTOR ERNAKULAM DISTRICT COLLECTOR


Oct 30 2023

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited vs Cochin Port Authority

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Oct-30-2023

IRIMPANAM, KOCHI, PIN - 682309. BY ADVS. THOMAS T.VARGHESE ACHU SUBHA ABRAHAM V.T.LITHA JIJO PAUL RESPONDENTS: 1 COCHIN PORT AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PORT AUTHORITY BUILDING, WILLINGDON ISLAND, COCHIN, PIN - 682003. 2 THE ESTATE OFFICER, COCHIN … ADVS. THOMAS T.VARGHESE ACHU SUBHA ABRAHAM V.T.LITHA JIJO PAUL RESPONDENTS: 1 COCHIN PORT AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PORT AUTHORITY BUILDING, WILLINGDON ISLAND, COCHIN, PIN - 682003. 2 THE ESTATE OFFICER, COCHIN PORT AUTHORITY, WILLINGDON ISLAND, KOCHI, PIN


Mar 23 2026

M/S Steel India Corporation vs Chennai Port Authority

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-23-2026

M.DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.Nos.5955 and 5956 of 2024 M/s.STEEL INDIA CORPORATION Rep. By its Managing Partner P.R.Teju .. PetitionerVersusChennai Port Authority, Chennai Port Trust, No.1, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 600 001. .. Respondent Prayer in W.P.No.5405 of 2024 : … connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 23.03.2026 Index : yes/noSpeaking order/Non-speaking orderNeutral Citation : yes/no grs To The Chennai Port Authority, Chennai Port Trust, No.1, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 600 001.M.DHANDAPANI, J.grs and W.M.P.Nos.5955 and 5956 of 2024 23.03.2026


Mar 24 2025

Chennai Port Trust vs Chennai Port Authority

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-24-2025

S1 Arivaham Apartments, No.18 Street, Tamil Nadu Housing Board, Koratur, Chennai - 600 080. ... Petitioner Vs. Chennai Port Authority, Rep. by its Chairman, No.1, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 600 001. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under … an association registered under the Societies Registration Act and the employees, who worked/working in the canteen of Chennai Port Authority are members Page No.2 of 6of the petitioner association. The employees are covered under the Employees Provident Funds


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial