Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

M/S.Devan Industries vs M/S.Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd.,

M/S.Devan Industries vs M/S.Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd.,

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jun 22, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1441069

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/17899/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M/S.Devan Industries

Respondent

M/S.Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd.,

Excerpt

.....khivraj complex 11, 477-482, anna salai, chennai 600035 rep. by its chief manager, satheeshkumar p. 2.j.jayaseelan - mortgagor/guarantor door no.5, plot no.19, extension selaiyur 3.ida jaseelan - mortgagor/guarantor, door no.5 plot no.19, extension, selaiyur respondentsprayer: petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india seeking issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records in impugned order in crl.mp.no.7318 of 2023 dated 04.03.2024 passed by the honourable chief judicial magistrate, chengalpettu and quash the same and the proceedings arising thereof and consequently direct the respondents to handover the physical possession of the property to the petitioner.for petitioner: mr. praveen for m/s. nathan and associates for respondents: mr. t.v.arvintraj for mr. v.balasubramani for r1 r2 and r3 - no appearanceorder(order of the court was made by the hon'ble chief justice) learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law. the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. there shall be no order as to costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (sushrut arvind dharmadhikari, cj) (g.arul murugan,j) index : yes/no neutral citation : yes/no bbr the hon'ble chief justice andg.arul murugan,j.bbr

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22.06.2026

CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN and W.M.P.Nos.19662 and 19663 of 2024 Devan Industries Rep. by its Proprietor G.Ganaprakash Devakumar, No.15, Thonakulam Village, Devaiyam Pakkam Panchayat, Wallajabad Ullavoor PO, Kancheepuram 631606, Tamil Nadu Also at Door No.5, Plot No.19 3rd Cross Street, Rajeswari Nagar, Extension, Selaiyur, (Also called as Dhanalakshmi Street) Petitioner Vs 1.Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd., 11th Floor, North Side R-Tech Park, Western Express Highway, Goregaon (East), Mumbai 400063. Branch Office at 6th Floor at Khivraj Complex 11, 477-482, Anna Salai, Chennai 600035 Rep. by its Chief Manager, Satheeshkumar P. 2.J.Jayaseelan - Mortgagor/Guarantor Door No.5, Plot No.19, Extension Selaiyur 3.Ida Jaseelan - Mortgagor/Guarantor, Door No.5 Plot No.19, Extension, Selaiyur Respondents

PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records in impugned Order in Crl.MP.No.7318 of 2023 dated 04.03.2024 passed by the Honourable Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpettu and quash the same and the proceedings arising thereof and consequently direct the respondents to handover the physical possession of the property to the petitioner.

For Petitioner: Mr. Praveen for M/s. Nathan and Associates For Respondents: Mr. T.V.Arvintraj for Mr. V.Balasubramani for R1 R2 and R3 - No Appearance

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No bbr THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND

G.ARUL MURUGAN,J.

bbr

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial