Reconstruction Company - Judgment Search Results

Asset Reconstruction Company Vs. Kumar Metallurgical Corporation

Court: DRAT Madras

Reported in: IV(2005)BC117

enacting the SARFAESI Act was to regulate the securitization and reconstruction of financial assets and enforcement of security interest. Paramount interest hereinafter referred to as SARFAESI Act). The respondent No. 1 Company had availed credit facilities from ICICI Ltd. (subsequently merged with

Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited Rep. by Its Vice Presiden ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2006]134CompCas267(Mad); 2006(3)CTC529; (2006)2MLJ822; [2006]72SCL18(Mad)

belonging to the company under liquidation.3. The appellant _ Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited is a company formed under the Securitisation Company Application Nos. 712 and 713 of 2005 before the Company Court seeking to appoint the appellant as agent of the

Asset. Reconstruction Company Vs. Paharpur Cooling Towers Ltd. and anr ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR2008MP79

is initiating enforcement of the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 any of their assets movable or immovable belonging to respondent company to any third party:3) In case if possession of any

Asset Reconstruction Company Vs. Paharpur Cooling Towers Ltd. and anr.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: (2008)1CompLJ306(MP); 2007(4)MPLJ560

group of banks or financial institution, including securitisation company or reconstruction company. It was in view of the provisions of the secured creditors and the amount due to them.(4) The appellant company shall file an undertaking before the company court to the

Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. Vs. Excel Dealcomm Pvt. Ltd. ...

Court: Kolkata

that it would intend to work in the field of reconstruction of industrial units. Unless appropriate licence is obtained from the the SARFAESI Act would require an appropriate registration of a company that it would intend to work in the field of

Asset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub Regist ...

Court: Karnataka

& P RESPECTIVELY AND ETC. IN W.P.NO.9578 OF2017BETWEEN M/S ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY (INDIA) LIMITED (ARCIL) THE RUBY, 10TH FLOOR, NO.29, SENAPATI road, Anna Nagar, Chennai- 600040 in favour of Assets reconstruction company (Arcil) India Ltd, No.29, The Ruby 10th floor, senapati Bapat

Asset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. Bishal Jaiswal

Court: Supreme Court of India

issued a notice under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002 fair view of the state of the affairs of the company, including that of its branch office or offices, if any,

Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited Vs. The Inspector General ...

Court: Chennai

and Securitisation Company under the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 of the Sub-Registrar, Alandur, Chennai.) 1. The petitioner, being a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and Securitisation Company under

Indiabulls Asset Reconstruction Company Limited Vs. Ram Kishor Arora

Court: Supreme Court of India

OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1925 OF2023INDIABULLS ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS RAM KISHORE ARORA & ORS. .RESPONDENT(S) by the Union Bank of India and Indiabulls Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. respectively, being the financial creditors of the corporate debtor

Asset Reconstruction Company India Ltd. Vs. Amit Ventures Private Ltd. ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR2007Cal49

a notice issued under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (hereinafter the commencement of this Act, the secured creditor of such company, who opts to realise his security instead of relinquishing his