Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jancy Shijo vs State of Kerala

Jancy Shijo vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Sep 29, 2023
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1377761

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/5997/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jancy Shijo

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice gopinath p. friday, the 29th day of september 2023 / 7th aswina, 1945 to quash annexure - 1 fir and all further proceedings in crime no.258/2022 of peruvannamuzhy police station dated 12.12.2022 petitioner/accused: xxxxxxxxxx by adv k.dilip respondents/state of kerala & complainant: 1 the state of kerala, rep. by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala at ernakulam pin - 682 031. 2 xxxxxxxxxx by advs. santharam.p rekha aravind(k/2130/1999) p.g.gokulnath(k/000170/2017) sri.noushad k a, sr.pp this criminal misc. case having come up for admission on 29.09.2023, the court on the same day passed the following:orderthe learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this crl.m.c was filed challenging the first information report in crime no.258 of 2022 of peruvannamuzhy police station. it is submitted that since the final report has already been filed, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this crl.m.c with liberty to challenge the final report. in the light of the permission sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the crl.m.c is is dismissed as withdrawn, reserving the liberty as aforesaid. sd/- gopinath p. judge dk

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 7TH ASWINA, 1945 TO QUASH ANNEXURE - 1 FIR AND ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN CRIME NO.258/2022 OF PERUVANNAMUZHY POLICE STATION DATED 12.12.2022 PETITIONER/ACCUSED: XXXXXXXXXX BY ADV K.DILIP RESPONDENTS/STATE OF KERALA & COMPLAINANT: 1 THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PIN - 682 031. 2 XXXXXXXXXX BY ADVS. SANTHARAM.P REKHA ARAVIND(K/2130/1999) P.G.GOKULNATH(K/000170/2017) SRI.NOUSHAD K A, SR.PP THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.09.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this Crl.M.C was filed challenging the First Information Report in Crime No.258 of 2022 of Peruvannamuzhy Police Station. It is submitted that since the final report has already been filed, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this Crl.M.C with liberty to challenge the Final Report. In the light of the permission sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Crl.M.C is is dismissed as withdrawn, reserving the liberty as aforesaid. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE DK

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial