Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rajeevan Moolayil vs National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal,Represented by Its Nodel Officer

Rajeevan Moolayil vs National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal,Represented by Its Nodel Officer

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Mar 06, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1311632

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/7287/2024

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rajeevan Moolayil

Respondent

National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal,Represented by Its Nodel Officer

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice devan ramachandran wednesday, the 6th day of march 2024 / 16th phalguna, 1945 petitioner: rajeevan moolayil, aged 47 years, s/o. moolayil raghavan, moolayil house, koovode, kuttikol, kannur, pin-670 141. k.n.abhilash sunil nair palakkat rithik s.anand rishi varma t.r. sreelakshmi menon p. k.m.tintu anu paul respondents: 1 national cyber crime reporting portal represented by its nodel officer national highway-8, mahipalpur, new delhi, pin-110 037.2 the director general of police, police headquarters, thiruvananthapuram, pin-695 001. 3 deputy superintendent of police, cyber police station, nashik city, 4 the station house officer, cyber crime police station, nashik city, 5 the branch manager, icici bank, kannur branch, kannur district, pin-670 001. -2- shahier singh m. sharan shahier(k/1202/2010) r1 sri.s.manu, dsgi r2 sri.vidya kuriakose, government pleader r5 sri.pradeesh chacko, standing counsel, icici bank this writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 06.03.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following: -3-judgmentdated this the 6th day of march, 2024 sri.abhilash k.n. - learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach this court again, if so required. therefore, the request is granted and the writ petition will stand dismissed as withdrawn, with the above liberty being reserved to the petitioner. sd/- devan ramachandran judge bpr

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 16TH PHALGUNA, 1945 PETITIONER: RAJEEVAN MOOLAYIL, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O. MOOLAYIL RAGHAVAN, MOOLAYIL HOUSE, KOOVODE, KUTTIKOL, KANNUR, PIN-670 141. K.N.ABHILASH SUNIL NAIR PALAKKAT RITHIK S.ANAND RISHI VARMA T.R. SREELAKSHMI MENON P. K.M.TINTU ANU PAUL RESPONDENTS: 1 NATIONAL CYBER CRIME REPORTING PORTAL REPRESENTED BY ITS NODEL OFFICER NATIONAL HIGHWAY-8, MAHIPALPUR, NEW DELHI, PIN-110 037.

2 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, POLICE HEADQUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001. 3 DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CYBER POLICE STATION, NASHIK CITY, 4 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION, NASHIK CITY, 5 THE BRANCH MANAGER, ICICI BANK, KANNUR BRANCH, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN-670 001. -2- SHAHIER SINGH M. SHARAN SHAHIER(K/1202/2010) R1 SRI.S.MANU, DSGI R2 SRI.VIDYA KURIAKOSE, GOVERNMENT PLEADER R5 SRI.PRADEESH CHACKO, STANDING COUNSEL, ICICI BANK THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -3-

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 6th day of March, 2024 Sri.Abhilash K.N. - learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach this Court again, if so required. Therefore, the request is granted and the writ petition will stand dismissed as withdrawn, with the above liberty being reserved to the petitioner. Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE bpr

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial