Skip to content


Director General - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: director general Page 1 of about 1,306 results (0.027 seconds)
May 30 2014 (TRI)

Ramakrishna Dutta, Directorate General of Inspection Customs, New Delh ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

the said Original Application by the applicant could annoy the Director General, New Delhi (respondent No.1) and only to subject him draw pay on first appointment shall be determined by the general or special orders of the authority by whom he is

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 01 1968 (HC)

Director General Ordnance Factories Employees' Association Vs. Union o ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1969Cal149,74CWN1,(1970)ILLJ707Cal

sections of the subordinate employees in the office of the Director-General of Ordnance Factories, represented by two Unions.2. The Petitioner is interpretation of the word 'person' in Section 3(39) of the General Clauses Act, the Court held that under Article 226, the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 14 1993 (TRI)

Director-general Vs. Voltas Ltd. and anr.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1994)79CompCas274NULL

Bharat Engineering Works (Jamnagar) Ltd. and M/s. Voltas Ltd. The Director-General has taken exception to the following Clause 3 of the products involved in the agreement pertaining to each enquiry. The general cross-examination recorded in RTPE No. 121 of 1986 was regarded

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 28 1991 (TRI)

Director-general of Vs. Cement Manufacturers

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1991)71CompCas46NULL

The price hike is not 30% as alleged by the Director-General but much less ; reference was made to paras 7, traders or traders generally or of any consumer or consumers generally, the Commission may, for the purposes of staying or preventing

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 31 1994 (TRI)

Director-general Vs. Rajashree Cement

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act.23. Counsel for the Director-General referring to the reply dated February 6, 1989, of the by it "having regard to the rates of such discount generally allowed by the other manufacturers, taking into account the likely

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 01 1998 (TRI)

Director-general Vs. Daewoo Motors India Ltd. and ors.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

The respondents were directed to file their replies to the Director-General's application within six weeks from its service under a copy that under Section 11(2) of the MRTP Act, the Director General is required to satisfy himself as to whether or not

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 24 2019 (HC)

Director General, e.s.i.c. Vs.saurabh Kumar & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Director (Medical) Delhi/ Regional Director/ Joint Director Incharge- Chairman Deputy Director/ Deputy Director (Medical)/ Deputy Director (General) Member (emphasis supplied) the ESIC. There is nothing to show that the Director General could not make appointments on Regional/ State basis in respect

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 06 1989 (TRI)

Director-general of Vs. Sahara India Saving and

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1990)68CompCas153NULL

respondent's explanation that the return as worked out by the Director-General is within the respondent's reach considering that the periods of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 24 1990 (TRI)

Director-general of Vs. Iofic Leasing Ltd.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1991)70CompCas62NULL

"full proof system". Shri O.P. Dua, learned counsel for the Director-General of Investigation and Registration, urges that, in fact, the respondent public interest, the interest of the consumers and consumers in general. I, therefore, pass a cease and desist order under Section

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 04 1993 (TRI)

Director-general (i and R) Vs. Nogi and Co. Pvt. Ltd. and anr.

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1994)80CompCas449NULL

to Clause (3) of the said agreement. According to the Director-General, this agreement had imposed a condition on respondent No. 1 thereby maintain more or less a uniform consumer price, is generally in the public interest.16. The close scrutiny of the two

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //