Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rajeevan vs State

Rajeevan vs STATE

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided May 22, 2024
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1289114

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.A/1045/2013
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rajeevan

Respondent

STATE

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice p.g. ajithkumar wednesday, the 22nd day of may 2024 / 1st jyaishta, 1946 crl.a no. 1045 of 2013 against the judgment dated 21.06.2013 in sc no.941 of 2011 of additional sessions court (adhoc)-ii, kollam appellant: rajeevan @ kunjumon s/o. parameswaran, pandiparambil house, korambisseri, iringalakuda village, thrissur. by advs. smt.aysha youseff sri.jobi.a.thampi respondent: state of kerala, represented by the public prosecutor, high court of kerala, ernakulam. smt.seena c., public prosecutor this criminal appeal having come up for admission on 22.05.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:p.g. ajithkumar, j.…...................................... …....................................................... dated this the 22nd day of may, 2024judgmentthis is an appeal against conviction. the appellant was convicted for the offences punishable under sections 279, 201 and 304 a of the indian penal code, 1860. both imprisonment and fine form part of the sentence.2. death of the appellant was reported as early as on26.08.2021. in terms of the direction by this court to collect and furnish details of the legal heirs of the appellant, the station house officer, oachira police station would report that his legal heir, one sreejith lives in iringalakkuda, but his whereabouts could be gather. although, three years elapse after reporting the death of the appellant, nobody has come forward to prosecute the appeal. in the said circumstances, records are consigned to the record room in terms of the law laid down by this court in pazhani v. state of kerala [2017(1) klt 341]. the trial court is directed to take steps for realisation of the fine amount from the assets left by the appellant, if any. sd/- p.g. ajithkumar, judge dxy

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF MAY 2024 / 1ST JYAISHTA, 1946 CRL.A NO. 1045 OF 2013 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 21.06.2013 IN SC NO.941 OF 2011 OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT (ADHOC)-II, KOLLAM APPELLANT: RAJEEVAN @ KUNJUMON S/O. PARAMESWARAN, PANDIPARAMBIL HOUSE, KORAMBISSERI, IRINGALAKUDA VILLAGE, THRISSUR. BY ADVS. SMT.AYSHA YOUSEFF SRI.JOBI.A.THAMPI RESPONDENT: STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. SMT.SEENA C., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

P.G. AJITHKUMAR, J.

…...................................... …....................................................... Dated this the 22nd day of May, 2024

JUDGMENT

This is an appeal against conviction. The appellant was convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 279, 201 and 304 A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Both imprisonment and fine form part of the sentence.

2. Death of the appellant was reported as early as on

26.08.2021. In terms of the direction by this Court to collect and furnish details of the legal heirs of the appellant, the Station House Officer, Oachira Police Station would report that his legal heir, one Sreejith lives in Iringalakkuda, but his whereabouts could be gather. Although, three years elapse after reporting the death of the appellant, nobody has come forward to prosecute the appeal. In the said circumstances, records are consigned to the record room in terms of the law laid down by this Court in Pazhani v. State of Kerala [2017(1) KLT 341]. The trial court is directed to take steps for realisation of the fine amount from the assets left by the appellant, if any. Sd/- P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JUDGE Dxy

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial