Come Forward - Judgment Search Results
Forward Seamen Union of India Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-05-2009
Matched in: Parties Forward Seamen Union of India Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Oberai Forwarding Agency Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-01-2000
Reported in: AIR2000SC855; 2000(4)ALLMR(SC)579; 2000(1)ALT26(SC); 2000(2)BLJR991; (2001)1CALLT9(SC); [2000]100CompCas591(SC); 2000(1)CTC556; JT2000(1)SC508; (2000)IIMLJ95(SC); 2000(3)MP
the assignee-first respondent was not a 'consumer'. For the first respondent, on the other hand, it was Oberai Forwarding Agency v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. S.C. 857 submitted that the document was indeed a Letter of
Raghu Forwarding Agency and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-23-2002
Reported in: JT2002(8)SC340; (2003)12SCC272
ORDER1. Leave granted.2. A civil writ petition was filed by the appellant which came to be disposed of on merits on 3rd August, 1999. The relief sought for by the appellant was allowed in part. On...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Forward Construction Co. and ors. Vs. Prabhat Mandal (Regd.), Andheri ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-26-1985
Reported in: AIR1986SC391; (1986)88BOMLR128; 1985(2)SCALE1123; (1986)1SCC100A; [1985]Supp3SCR766; 1986(1)LC167(SC); (1986) 1 SCC 100
we have placed on Regulation 3 and the proviso. Review Petition rejected.17. All the contesting parties have now come up in appeal against the judgment of the High Court dated 14th November 1983 to the extent it … the Engineer-in-Charge (Civil) of the BEST. In addition to the said advertisement in the newspapers, notices were also forwarded to 22 well-known builders out of whom 12 builders purchased the tender forms on payment of Rs. 1000
Forward Seamens' Union of India vs Mr. T K Ramachandran
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-27-2024
- 110001 BY ADV SUVIN R MENON OTHER PRESENT: DSGI S.MANU THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Con.Case (C) No.2548 of … PHALGUNA, CON.CASE(C) NO. 2548 OF 2023 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT WP(C) 28407/2020 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/S: 1 FORWARD SEAMENS' UNION OF INDIA (REG.NO 9442) 101, USHA SADAN FLAT NO.3, 2ND FLOOR, BORA BAZAR STREET, MUMBAI 400001,
Railway Cleaning & Forwarding Employees Charitable Soceity vs Union of ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-22-2023
..2..SRI.A.DINESH RAO, SC, RAILWAYS SMT.A.R.PRAVITHA SRI.H.PRAVEEN KOTTARAKARA SMT.D.S.THUSHARA SRI.K.SHRI HARI RAO, SC, RAILWAYS THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 22.03.2023, ALONG WITH WP(C).18978/2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ..3..IN … 22ND DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 1ST CHAITHRA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 18978 OF 2015 PETITIONER/S: RAILWAY CLEANING & FORWARDING EMPLOYEES CHARITABLE SOCEITY REGISTRATION NO.ER.493/2010,RAJIVE BHAVAN,EDAPPALLY.P.O,KOCHI-682024,REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT MR.RASHEED THANATH. SRI.C.S.AJITH PRAKASH SRI.P.S.SYAMKUTTAN RESPONDENT/S: 1 UNION OF
Raghu Forwarding Agency and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jun-29-2005
respect of remaining five Wagons of coal were concerned, the learned Judge granted relief. The Respondents have not come up in appeal against the said direction.3.7. So far as the plea of Respondents that no notice was
Forward Financial Services Ltd. Vs. Primus Chemicals Ltd.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-15-2008
Reported in: 2009(2)BomCR495
constraining the Court to pronounce judgment against him.9. Once the judgment is pronounced the jurisdiction of the Court comes to an end. Hence, as in the case of a judgment being pronounced under Order VIII, Rule 10
Kishan Freight Forwarders Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-02-2011
the Petitioners in terms of the CPLP to be granted extension of their leases. A new policy had come into place by means of Circular No. 3 of 2010 even prior to the expiry of the three … and that too not strictly in conformity with the CPLP and Clause 18.1. As regards M/s. Kishan Freight Forwarders [the Petitioner in W.P. (C) Nos. 7289 of 2010, 7290 of 2010, 7291 of 2010, 2041 and 2042
Ups Worldwide Forwarding Inc. Vs. Ups Jetair Express Private Limited a ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-25-2013
M.S. Sanklecha, J. RULE, returnable forthwith and by consent of the parties, taken up for final disposal. 2 By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges the order dated 21...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free