Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vivek Kumar Constable vs Union of India & Ors.

Vivek Kumar Constable vs Union of India & Ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided May 26, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1257637

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
W.P.(C)/1968/2025
Subject
Motor Vehicles

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Motor Vehicles

Key legal issue
Motor Vehicles

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vivek Kumar Constable

Advocate Mr. Abhishek Saket, Mr. Manish Madhukar, Mr. Abhigyan, Ms. Reya Paul

Respondent

Union of India & Ors.

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ w.p.(c) 1968/2025vivek kumar constable.....petitioner through: none.versusunion of india & ors......respondent through: mr. abhishek saket (spcg), mr. manish madhukar, mr. abhigyan, ms. reya paul, advs.coram:hon'ble mr. justice anil kshetarpalhon'ble mr. justice amit mahajanorder% 26.05.20261. there is no representation on behalf of petitioner.2. through this writ petition, the petitioner prays for thefollowing relief :(i) issue a writ of certiorari for quashing of letter datedseptember 2024 whereby respondents rejected the petitioner's pension proposal on grounds of disability; and(ii) issue of writ of mandamus directing the respondents tothereby grant him with disability pension and all consequential benefits as per rules; and iii) pass any such orders as the hon'ble court may deem fit in the light of above mentioned facts and circumstances of the case.”3. today, learned counsel representing the respondent hasproduced the order dated 24.04.2026, wherein sanction of the competent authority has been conveyed for grant of ex gratia lumpsum of ₹5,60,000/- to the petitioner for his 28% permanentdisability. invalid pension has also been sanctioned by order dated 02.12.2025.4. admittedly, this amount was payable to the petitioner in theyear 2017. there has been delay of nearly nine years.5. hence, the respondent is directed to release the amount alongwith interest at the rate of 6% per annum as prayed for by the petitioner.6. with these observations, the writ petition is disposed of.anil kshetarpal, jamit mahajan, jmay 26, 2026“sk”

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 1968/2025

VIVEK KUMAR CONSTABLE

.....Petitioner Through: None.

versus

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

.....Respondent Through: Mr. Abhishek Saket (SPCG), Mr. Manish Madhukar, Mr. Abhigyan, Ms. Reya Paul, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

ORDER

% 26.05.2026

1. There is no representation on behalf of Petitioner.

2. Through this Writ Petition, the Petitioner prays for the

following relief :

(i) Issue a Writ of Certiorari for quashing of letter dated

September 2024 whereby Respondents rejected the Petitioner's pension proposal on grounds of disability; and

(ii) Issue of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to

thereby grant him with disability pension and all consequential benefits as per rules; and iii) Pass any such orders as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the light of above mentioned facts and circumstances of the case.”

3. Today, learned counsel representing the Respondent has

produced the Order dated 24.04.2026, wherein sanction of the Competent Authority has been conveyed for grant of Ex Gratia Lumpsum of ₹5,60,000/- to the Petitioner for his 28% permanent

disability. Invalid pension has also been sanctioned by Order dated 02.12.2025.

4. Admittedly, this amount was payable to the Petitioner in the

year 2017. There has been delay of nearly nine years.

5. Hence, the Respondent is directed to release the amount along

with interest at the rate of 6% per annum as prayed for by the Petitioner.

6. With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J

AMIT MAHAJAN, J

MAY 26, 2026

“SK”

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial