Competent Authority - Judgment Search Results

Competent Authority, Entrance Examination Vs. Rajesh Pandita

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: 2003(2)JKJ757

Judge passed in OWP No. 692/2002 whereby writ petition filed by Rajesh Pandita has been allowed and the Competent Authority has been directed to admit him against the payment seat which became available during the councelling. LPA No. … been permitted to file LPA against the said judgment.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that Competent Authority Entrance Examination, J&K; conducted Common Entrance Test for filling the seats to the MBBS/BDS/B.Sc(Agri) and other disciplines for

The Additional Chief Administrator-cum-competent Authority Vs. the Add ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Regional and Town Planning and Development Act, 1995. Not in one but in a series of cases the competence of the officer in the rank of Under Secretary sitting as Revisional Authority over the orders mostly passed

Competent Authority Calcutta, Under Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos.10629­10631 OF2014The Competent Authority Calcutta, Under the Land (Ceiling And Regulation) Act, 1976 And Anr. ….Appellant(s) Versus David Mantosh & Ors. ….Respondent(s) … Mantosh & Ors. ….Respondent(s) 1 JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. C.A. Nos.10629­10631 of 2014 are filed by the Competent Authority against the Judgment and Order dated 27.09.2013 in F.A. No.202/2008, Judgment and Order dated 24.07.2014 in the Review

Competent Authority Vs. Barangore Jute Factory and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (SCSuppl)2006(2)CHN19; RLW2006(1)SC388; 2005(9)SCALE493; (2005)13SCC477

against the judgment of the High Court dated 7th April, 2004. The special leave petitions filed by the Competent Authority are registered as SLP (Civil) No. 16820 of 2004 while those filed by the National Highways Authority of … owners are being referred to as the writ petitioners in this judgment. The other main parties are the Competent Authority and the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) and they will be referred to as such in the

Competent Authority, Ahmedabad Vs. Amritlal Chandmal JaIn and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1998IVAD(SC)285; AIR1998SC2083; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)899; 1998(2)ALT(Cri)120; 1998CriLJ2920; 1998(2)Crimes316(SC); (1998)3GLR2081; JT1998(3)SC544; 1998(3)SCALE333; (1998)5SCC615;

29, 1993 of a Division Bench of the Gujarat High Court and have been filed respectively by the Competent Authority and the State of Gujarat. By this impugned judgment the High Court allowed two writ petitions filed by … 1976 (for short 'SAFEMA') against the respondents. The third appeal (Civil Appeal 1487/94) has been filed by the Competent Authority and is directed against the judgment dated June 23, 1993 of another Division Bench of the Gujarat High

Tekchand Vs. Competent Authority.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [1993]201ITR658(SC)

of Smuggling Activities Act, 1947 (COFEPOSA), provided the said order has not been revoked or withdrawn by the Competent Authority before the completion of the period prescribed or set aside by a competent court. The third category is … was neither quashed nor set aside by a competent court nor was it withdrawn or revoked by a competent authority. The validity of the said detention order is not questioned in these proceedings.On February 22, 1978, notices under

Competent Authority, Tarana District, UjjaIn (M.P.) Vs. Vijay Gupta an ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1991Supp(2)SCC631

but it was filed only after the period of thirty days. This objection petition was rejected by the Competent Authority on the short ground that it was filed beyond the period prescribed under sub-section (3) of Section 11 … under sub-section (3) of Section 11 of the Act. The respondents aggrieved against the aforesaid order of the Competent Authority, filed a suit in the civil court agitating certain questions of title and also challenged the order passed

Competent Authority and Administrator vs.navita Aggarwal

Court: Delhi

$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4906/2018 and IA No.18873/2018 COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND ADMINISTRATOR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Ms Gauran and Mr Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advocates. versus … AGGARWAL ..... Respondent Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0307.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner ‒ Competent Authority, Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976 (hereafter referred to as „the Competent Authority‟) ‒

Ishwar vs Competent Authority and Administrator

Court: Delhi

DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2100/2022, CM APPL. 6033/2022, CM APPL. 57370/2025& CM APPL. 57371/2025ISHWAR .....Petitioner Through: None.versusCOMPETENT AUTHORITY AND ADMINISTRATOR.....Respondent Through: Mr Ishkaran Singh Bhandari with Mr Piyush Yadav, Advs.CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 28.04.20261.

Haridas vs Competent Authority,Smugglers & Foreign Exchange Manipulato ...

Court: Kerala

VEEDU, POOTHAKKULAM P.O.,PARAVOOR, KOLLAM DIST 4 VALSA THENGUVILA VEEDU, ELAKAMON P.O.,AYROOR VILLAGE,VARKALA BY ADVS.SRI.P.A.AHAMMED SRI.THOUFEEK AHAMED RESPONDENTS: 1 COMPETENT AUTHORITY SMUGGLERS AND FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANIPULATORS(FORFEITURE OF PROPERTY)UTSAV, NO.64/1,G.N.CHETTY ROAD, T.NAGAR, CHENNAI-6000017 2 DISTRICT COLLECTOR THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001 BY ADVS.SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASG … NO. 34985 OF 2011 PETITIONER: KUMUDA BHAI W/O.LATE RAMAN,VIJAYAMANDIRAM,ELAKAMON P.O,AYROOR P.O,VARKALA BY ADVS. SRI.P.A.AHAMMED SRI.THOUFEEK AHAMED RESPONDENTS: 1 COMPETENT AUTHORITY, SMUGGLERS AND FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANIPULATORS(FORFEITURE OF PROPERTY),UTSAV,NO.64/1,G.N.CHETTY ROAD,T.NAGAR,CHENNAI 600 0172 DISTRICT COLLECTOR THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 005 BY ADVS. SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN