Petitioner Vs. Respondent

Petitioner vs Respondent

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Nov 02, 2016

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1187536

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1187536
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: The Honourable Mr. M. Jaichandren &Amp; The Honourable Mr. S. Baskaran
Decided On: Nov 02, 2016
Case Number: Crl Mp No. 11553 of 2016 In H.C.P. No. 2317 of 2016
Subject: Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue: Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Petitioner

Respondent

Excerpt

.....expenses relating to the escort shall be borne by the state government. f. the detenu shall abide by the conditions to be imposed by the authorities concerned. 3. it had been stated, in the order, that the detenu, should be brought back to the central prison, salem, by 04.00 p.m., on 02.11.2016, after completion of the funeral ceremonies. 4. the present criminal miscellaneous petition, has been filed, by the petitioner, requesting that, this court may extend the parole period, granted to the detenu, and to modify the order, passed by this court, on 26.10.2016. it has been prayed that the detenu may be taken back, and kept in the custody of central prison, salem, at 12.00 noon, on 03.11.2016. 5. the learned additional public prosecutor, appearing on behalf of the respondents, has no objection, for this court, passing an order, granting extension of time, as prayed for, by the petitioner. 6. hence, the earlier order, passed by this court, on 26.10.2016, in h.c.p.no.2317 of 2016, stands modified accordingly. as such, the detenu, shall be taken back to salem, to be kept in the custody, in the central prison, salem, by 12.00 noon, on 03.11.2016, instead of, at 04.00 p.m. on 02.11.2016. the other conditions, prescribed by this court, in its order, dated 26.10.2016, in h.c.p.no.2317 of 2016, shall continue, without any modification. 7. the criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed accordingly.

Full Judgment

M. Jaichandren, J.

1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondents.

2. This Court, had passed an order, on 26.10.2016, in H.C.P.No.2317 of 2016, granting leave to the detenu, to attend the funeral ceremonies, relating to the death of his brother, with the following conditions:-

6. In view of the above, we pass the following order:

a. The detenu, namely, K.Manickam @ Poonganagar Manickam, who is now confined at Central Prison, Salem, is permitted to go on Parole, from 4.00 p.m., on 31.10.2016 to 4.00 p.m., on 2.11.2016.

b. The Superintendent of Central Prison, Salem, is hereby directed to pass appropriate orders releasing the detenu on Parole, as aforestated.

c. The Jail Authorities are directed to release the detenu, namely, K.Manickam @ Poonganagar Manickam, on production of a copy of this order.

d. It is made clear that the detenu should be brought back to the Central Prison, Salem, by 4.00 p.m. on 2.11.2016, without fail.

e. The Jail Authorities, during the period of Parole, shall provide proper escort to the detenu in order to ensure the safety and security of the detenu. They shall also impose suitable conditions to that effect. The expenses relating to the escort shall be borne by the State Government.

f. The detenu shall abide by the conditions to be imposed by the authorities concerned.

3. It had been stated, in the order, that the detenu, should be brought back to the Central Prison, Salem, by 04.00 p.m., on 02.11.2016, after completion of the funeral ceremonies.

4. The present Criminal Miscellaneous Petition, has been filed, by the petitioner, requesting that, this Court may extend the parole period, granted to the detenu, and to modify the order, passed by this Court, on 26.10.2016. It has been prayed that the detenu may be taken back, and kept in the custody of Central Prison, Salem, at 12.00 noon, on 03.11.2016.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing on behalf of the respondents, has no objection, for this Court, passing an order, granting extension of time, as prayed for, by the petitioner.

6. Hence, the earlier order, passed by this Court, on 26.10.2016, in H.C.P.No.2317 of 2016, stands modified accordingly. As such, the detenu, shall be taken back to Salem, to be kept in the custody, in the Central Prison, Salem, by 12.00 noon, on 03.11.2016, instead of, at 04.00 p.m. on 02.11.2016. The other conditions, prescribed by this Court, in its order, dated 26.10.2016, in H.C.P.No.2317 of 2016, shall continue, without any modification.

7. The Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is allowed accordingly.

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2016 Same Parties Petitioner vs Respondent Same Subject Right to Information Same Judge The Honourable Mr. M. Jaichandren &Amp; The Honourable Mr. S....