Petitioner Vs. Respondent

Petitioner vs Respondent

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Jan 03, 2017

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1186200

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1186200
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: M. Venugopal
Decided On: Jan 03, 2017
Case Number: Crl. M.P. No. 13834 of 2016 in Crl. A. No. 380 of 2016
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Petitioner

Respondent

Excerpt

1. heard both sides. 2. according to the petitioners/a1 and a2, they are abiding the condition imposed by this court, in crl.m.p.no.5789 of 2016 in crl.a.no.380 of 2016 dated 06.07.2016, from 03.08.2016 till date. 3. the reason ascribed on behalf of the petitioners is that by virtue of the condition imposed by this court in crl.m.p.no.5789 of 2016 in crl.a.no.380 of 2016 dated 06.07.2016, they are unable to attend their normal duties and they are put to hardship and sufferings. further, they are not able to attend to their family affairs in a proper manner. 4. the fact that the petitioners are abiding the condition imposed by this court in crl.m.p.no.5789 of 2016 in crl.a.no.380 of 2016 dated 06.07.2016 without any default, is not disputed on behalf of the respondent/prosecuting agency. 5. considering the fact that the petitioners/a1 and a2 are abiding the condition imposed by this court in crl.m.p.no.5789 of 2016 in crl.a.no.380 of 2016 dated 06.07.2016 without any default [as seen from the report of learned judicial magistrate, palacode i/c. in d.no.3789/2016, dated 30.12.2016 addressed to this court], this court relaxes the condition already imposed, by directing the petitioners/a1 and a2 to appear before the learned judicial magistrate, palacode once in a month on the first working day of every english calendar month at 11.00 a.m. without fail until further orders. 6. accordingly, the crl.m.p.no.13834 of 2016 is ordered, on above terms.

Full Judgment

1. Heard both sides.

2. According to the Petitioners/A1 and A2, they are abiding the condition imposed by this Court, in Crl.M.P.No.5789 of 2016 in Crl.A.No.380 of 2016 dated 06.07.2016, from 03.08.2016 till date.

3. The reason ascribed on behalf of the Petitioners is that by virtue of the condition imposed by this Court in Crl.M.P.No.5789 of 2016 in Crl.A.No.380 of 2016 dated 06.07.2016, they are unable to attend their normal duties and they are put to hardship and sufferings. Further, they are not able to attend to their family affairs in a proper manner.

4. The fact that the Petitioners are abiding the condition imposed by this Court in Crl.M.P.No.5789 of 2016 in Crl.A.No.380 of 2016 dated 06.07.2016 without any default, is not disputed on behalf of the Respondent/Prosecuting Agency.

5. Considering the fact that the Petitioners/A1 and A2 are abiding the condition imposed by this Court in Crl.M.P.No.5789 of 2016 in Crl.A.No.380 of 2016 dated 06.07.2016 without any default [as seen from the Report of Learned Judicial Magistrate, Palacode i/c. In D.No.3789/2016, dated 30.12.2016 addressed to this Court], this Court relaxes the condition already imposed, by directing the Petitioners/A1 and A2 to appear before the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Palacode once in a month on the First Working day of every English calendar month at 11.00 a.m. without fail until further orders.

6. Accordingly, the Crl.M.P.No.13834 of 2016 is ordered, on above terms.

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2017 Same Parties Petitioner vs Respondent Same Subject Criminal Same Judge M. Venugopal