inderjit Singh Vs.

Type Court Judgment Court Punjab and Haryana Decided Jan 29, 2013

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1058720

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1058720
Court: Punjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On: Jan 29, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

inderjit Singh

Excerpt

.....majithia,senior advocate assisted by mr.shailender sharma,advocate for the respondent/ landlord. jaswant singh,j(oral).the petitioner/tenant is in revision under section 15(5) of the east punjab urban rent restriction act,1949 (for short the epurr act) against the order dated 8.11.2011 passed by the learned rent controller, dasuya and the order dated 2.11.2012 passed by the learned appellate authority, hoshiarpur affirming the findings whereby the petitioner/tenant has been ordered to be evicted from the demised shop on the ground of personal necessity of the landlord . at the time of hearing on january 22,2013, learned counsel for the petitioner realising that this court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned orders.prayed for grant of 1½ year's time to vacate the demised shop where the tenant is doing his tailoring business since last 12 years.in response, learned counsel for the respondent had cr 7508/2012(o&m) 2 prayed for time to seek instructions. at the time of hearing today, learned counsel for the respondent, on instructions, states at the bar that the respondent has agreed to the grant of 14 months' time to the petitioner to vacate the demised shop, subject to his clearing arrears of rent and continuing to pay the future rent. the offer made is acceptable to the petitioner. in view of the agreed stand taken by the learned counsel for the parties, the present revision petition is dismissed as not pressed, however 14 months' time commencing from 1.2.2013 is granted to the petitioner/tenant for making alternative arrangement to shift his business subject to his furnishing an undertaking on or before 28.2.2013 before the learned rent controller, dasuya that he shall hand over actual, physical, vacant and peaceful possession of the demised shop to the respondent/landlord by 31.3.2014. the petitioner shall also clear arrears of rent, if any, and shall continue to pay future rent in advance by 10th of every calendar month. needless to say that any.....

Full Judgment

CR 7508/2012(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR 7508/2012(O&M) Date of decision:29/01/2013 Inderjit Singh ............Petitioner v.

Paramjit Singh .............Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present:- Mr.Avtar Singh Bhatti,Advocate for the petitioner/tenant.

Mr.Sanjay Majithia,Senior Advocate assisted by Mr.Shailender Sharma,Advocate for the respondent/ landlord.

Jaswant Singh,J(Oral).The petitioner/tenant is in revision under Section 15(5) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act,1949 (for short the EPURR Act) against the order dated 8.11.2011 passed by the learned Rent Controller, Dasuya and the order dated 2.11.2012 passed by the learned Appellate Authority, Hoshiarpur affirming the findings whereby the petitioner/tenant has been ordered to be evicted from the demised shop on the ground of personal necessity of the landlord .

At the time of hearing on January 22,2013, learned counsel for the petitioner realising that this Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned ordeRs.prayed for grant of 1½ year's time to vacate the demised shop where the tenant is doing his tailoring business since last 12 yeaRs.In response, learned counsel for the respondent had CR 7508/2012(O&M) 2 prayed for time to seek instructions.

At the time of hearing today, learned counsel for the respondent, on instructions, states at the Bar that the respondent has agreed to the grant of 14 months' time to the petitioner to vacate the demised shop, subject to his clearing arrears of rent and continuing to pay the future rent.

The offer made is acceptable to the petitioner.

In view of the agreed stand taken by the learned counsel for the parties, the present revision petition is dismissed as not pressed, however 14 months' time commencing from 1.2.2013 is granted to the petitioner/tenant for making alternative arrangement to shift his business subject to his furnishing an undertaking on or before 28.2.2013 before the learned Rent Controller, Dasuya that he shall hand over actual, physical, vacant and peaceful possession of the demised shop to the respondent/landlord by 31.3.2014.

The petitioner shall also clear arrears of rent, if any, and shall continue to pay future rent in advance by 10th of every calendar month.

Needless to say that any violation of the aforesaid terms shall entitle the landlord to seek petitioner's eviction forthwith with police help, if necessary, without recouRs.to any other remedy besides the petitioner/tenant making himself liable to be hauled up in contempt proceedings.

29.01.2013.

(Jaswant Singh) joshi Judge

Same Court & Year Punjab and Haryana · 2013 Same Parties inderjit Singh vs Same Subject Education