Rent Control - Judgment Search Results
Pritamchand Vs. Rent Controlling Authority
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-30-1979
Reported in: AIR1979MP148; 1979MPLJ741
16th Oct. 1978 (Annexure-9), passed by the Authorised Officer, Seoni, under Section 39 of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961, asking the petitioner to give his option for allotment of a house situated on Station Road,
Rent Control and Eviction Officer, Allahabad Vs. Dr. M.M. Laloraya and ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-21-1972
Reported in: AIR1972All559
Satish Chandra, J.1. These two appeals have been preferred by the Rent Control and Eviction Officer, Allahabad. They are directed against a judgment quashing an order rejecting an application for release … accommodation in favour of Mr. U. C. Misra,, respondent, and also quashing proceedings under Section 7-A of the Rent Control Act, for the eviction of the landlord. The two Laloraya brothers, who are respondents Nos. 1 and 2
The Rent Control and Eviction Officer, Etah Vs. Asharfi Lal and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-28-1957
Reported in: AIR1958All153
premises in Kasganj belonging to the third respondent fell vacant and the first respondent applied forthwith to the Rent Control and Eviction Officer that they be allotted to him. This application was made with the approval of the … consent thereon. Three days later, on the 18th September, the landlord sent an intimation to the appellant, the Rent Control and Eviction Officer, under Section 7 (1) (a) of the U. P, (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Citizens Against Rent Control Vs. City of Berkeley
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-14-1981
Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of Berkeley - 454 U.S. 290 (1981) U.S. Supreme Court Citizens Against Rent Control v. City … Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of Berkeley - 454 U.S. 290 (1981) U.S. Supreme Court Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of Berkeley, 454 U.S. 290 (1981) Citizens Against Rent Control/Coalition for Fair Housing v. City of
Moti Lal and Another Vs. Rent Control and Eviction Officer and Others
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-18-1993
Reported in: AIR1993SC2320; 1993Supp(4)SCC741
was the tenant of the shop. Some time in 1975-76, one Hari Prasad filed an application before the Rent Control and Eviction Officer for allotting the said shop to him on the ground that Manohar Lal was an
Koyilerian Janaki and ors. Vs. Rent Controller (Munsiff), Cannanore an ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-14-2000
Reported in: (2000)9SCC406
before us. The respondent who is the landlady of the premises in dispute filed a petition before the Rent Control Court for eviction of the appellant herein on the grounds that she bona fide needs the building for … daughter and son-in-law who are medical practitioners and also for demolition of the premises and its reconstruction. The Rent Control Court found that there is no relationship of landlord-tenant between the parties. Therefore, the petition filed by the
Dr. K.C. Nambiar Vs. Rent Controller, Madras and ors. Overruled
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-18-1969
Reported in: AIR1970SC1656; (1969)2SCC465; [1970]1SCR906
J.C. Shah, Ag. C.J.1. The Legislature of the State of Madras enacted the Madras Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960. Section 4 of the Act (insofar as it is relevant) provides :-(1) The Controller shall, on
Masood Ahmad Vs. the Rent Control and Eviction Officer and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-16-1971
Reported in: AIR1972SC631; (1972)4SCC654; 1972(4)LC465(SC)
order of a shop in premises No. 80/79, Banasmandi Copprrganj, Kanpur dated October 21, 1967 made by the Rent Control and Eviction Officer Kanpur in favour of the appellant and releasing the same to the respondent No. 3 … thereafter the said tenant died leaving a widow. The appellant made an application dated July 23/28 to the Rent Control and Eviction Officer (hereinafter referred to as the 'officer') for allotment of the shop to himself under the
Laxmibai Prakash Buty and ors. Vs. Rent Controller and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-08-2005
Reported in: 2006(3)ALLMR267; 2006(1)BomCR334
of 2004 made following submissions.(i) That, there is no provision under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code or the Rent Control Order for reconstruction and as such the application was rightly rejected.(ii) That the record was lawfully destroyed by … so far as the next contention regarding there being no provisions under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code and Rent Control Order is concerned, the Division Bench of this Court (to which one of us i.e. B.R. Gavai, J.,
Maifoos Ahmad Vs. Rent Control and Eviction Officer/A.C.M. Iiird and o ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-04-2005
Reported in: 2005(1)AWC897
of 2002 under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner-tenant challenges the order passed by the Rent Control and Eviction Officer/A.C.M. IIIrd, Kanpur Nagar, dated 28th October, 2002, copy whereof is annexed as Annexure- VII to … the vacancy in the aforesaid accommodation. The aforesaid vacancy was declared when the case was registered by the Rent Control and Eviction Officer on the information of one Surendra Singh and on the basis of the aforesaid information
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free