Senior Advocate - Judgment Search Results

Rajiv K. Garg and Others Vs. Shanti Bhushan, Senior Advocate and Other ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1995SC573; 1995(1)ALT(Cri)245; 1995(1)KLT25(SC); 1994(4)SCALE635; (1995)1SCC3; [1994]Supp4SCR642; (1995)1UPLBEC199

and in particular the respondents, are misusing their privilege as advocates entitled to practice before this Hon'ble Court for the purposes

Present: Mr. Anupam Gupta Senior Advocate with Vs. State of Haryana an ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

members of the State Forest Service in the order of seniority provided that the Committee shall not consider the case of State of Haryana and others ...........Respondents Present: Mr.Anupam Gupta, Senior Advocate, with Mr.Tejinder Joshi and Mr.Shruti Sharma, Advocates, for the petitioner.

Present: Shri R.K. Malik Senior Advocate with Vs. State of Haryana and ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

by the High Court, negating the arguments that the inter-se seniority be determined on the basis of the respective date of Nitin Kaushal, AAG, Haryana, for respondent No.1. Shri Swarn Sandhir, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Shri H.N.Mehtani, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Shri

Present:- Shri R.K.Malik Senior Advocate with Shri Nikhil Sharma Vs. P ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

suitability test was conducted on 18.3.2011. Out of the 45 seniormost candidates summoned for suitability test, 21 candidates including the petitioner with Shri Nikhil Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri N.K.Joshi, Advocate for respondent-1. Shri D.S.Malwai, Advocate for respondent-9. Shri H.S.Guram, Advocate

Present: Mr. Sarjit Singh Senior Advocate with Vs. Government of India ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

to the enforcement of 1998 Rules and the posts of Senior Clerks-cum-Cashiers LPA No.1882 of 2011 (O&M) [ 10 ].LPA No.2171 Mr.Vikas Singh and Mr.Jagdev Singh, Advocates, for the appellants. Mr.N.C.Sahni, Advocate, for respondent No.4. Mr.K.S.Cheema, Advocate, for respondent Nos.5 to 9.

Present:- Shri Salil Sagar Senior Advocate with Shri Sunil Gaur Advoca ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

private respondents or the State who has candidly admitted this seniority and even obliquely admitted that the petitioner was superseded in Present:- Shri Salil Sagar, Senior Advocate with Shri Sunil Gaur, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Randhir Singh, Additional A.G.Haryana. Shri Raman

Present:- Mr.Rajiv Atma Ram Senior Advocate with Vs. State of Punjab a ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

said directions. The petitioners claimed their rightful place in the seniority list of the Assistant Corporation EngineeRs.Petitioner No.1 entered the service HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH GROVER *** Present:- Mr.Rajiv Atma Ram, Senior Advocate with Mr.Rajinder Singh Mann, Advocate, for the petitioneRs.Mr.Nilesh Bhardwaj, DAG,

Present Mr. Satya Pal JaIn Senior Advocate Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Punjab and Haryana

should be reported in the Digest?. Present Mr.Satya Pal Jain, Senior Advocate, with Mr.Dheeraj Jain, Advocate, for the appellants in CRA-S-3054-SB for the State. Mr.Kanwaljit Singh, Senior Advocate, with Mr.Siddhart Gupta, Advocate, for the complainant. VIJENDER SINGH MALIK, J. The three appeals

Present: Mr. Sumeet Mahajan Senior Advocate with Vs. State of Punjab a ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

adversely affect them. But later respondent No.4 led claim of seniority over the petitioners as Additional District & Sessions Judge on for respondent No.1. Mr.Arun Jain, Senior Advocate, with Ms.Deepali Puri, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Mr.D.S.Patwalia, Advocate, for respondent No.4. HEMANT GUPTA,

Present: Mr. Rajiv Atma Ram Senior Advocate with Vs. the Punjab Instit ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

out of which only 01 senior resident is present. 04 Senior Residents name appears in first half vacation list and 01 Ramsawroop, Addl. A.G., Punjab, for respondent no.3. Mr. Manish Dadwal, Advocate, for respondent no.4. ***** RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J.The petitioner is