Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Spenkelink Vs. Wainwright

Spenkelink vs Wainwright

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1979
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/104686

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
442 U.S. 1308
Subject
Consumer

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Consumer

Key legal issue
Consumer

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Spenkelink

Respondent

Wainwright

Excerpt

spenkelink v. wainwright - 442 u.s. 1308 (1979) u.s. supreme court spenkelink v. wainwright , 442 u.s. 1308 (1979) 442 u.s. 1308 john a. spenkelink, applicant, v. louie l. wainwright et al. no. a-1016. may 23, 1979. mr. justice marshall. john a. spenkelink, who is scheduled to be put to death at 7:00 a. m. on may 23, 1979, has applied to me for a stay of his execution. mr. justice rehnquist and mr. justice stevens have both denied the application, and the pertinent facts are set forth in mr. justice rehnquist's opinion, 442 u.s. 1301 . given the court of appeals' divided vote on whether to grant a certificate of probable cause, the irrevocable nature of the penalty to be imposed, and the ability of the full court to consider this case within 36 hours at our regular conference, i believe it appropriate to grant the application for a stay until further action by the entire court. granted.[ spenkelink v. wainwright 442 u.s. 1308 (1979) ]

Full Judgment

SPENKELINK v. WAINWRIGHT - 442 U.S. 1308 (1979)
U.S. Supreme Court SPENKELINK v. WAINWRIGHT , 442 U.S. 1308 (1979)

442 U.S. 1308

John A. SPENKELINK, Applicant,
v.
Louie L. WAINWRIGHT et al.
No. A-1016.

May 23, 1979.

Mr. Justice MARSHALL.

John A. Spenkelink, who is scheduled to be put to death at 7:00 a. m. on May 23, 1979, has applied to me for a stay of his execution. Mr. Justice REHNQUIST and Mr. Justice STEVENS have both denied the application, and the pertinent facts are set forth in Mr. Justice REHNQUIST's opinion, 442 U.S. 1301 . Given the Court of Appeals' divided vote on whether to grant a certificate of probable cause, the irrevocable nature of the penalty to be imposed, and the ability of the full Court to consider this case within 36 hours at our regular Conference, I believe it appropriate to grant the application for a stay until further action by the entire Court.

Granted.[ Spenkelink v. Wainwright 442 U.S. 1308 (1979) ]

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial