Advanced Search Results

The Registrar, University of Madras and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi), ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Consumer

Reported in : (1995)2MLJ367

in this batch of writ petitions, one relating to the validity of some of the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (Act No. 68 of 1986), (hereinafter called 'the Act') and the other relating to the

Sanjay R. Kothari and anr. Vs. South Mumbai Consumer Disputes Redressa ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 13(4), (5) and (6); Maharashtra Consumer Protection Rules, 2000 - Rules 4(7), 8(7), 9(1) and (6)

Reported in : AIR2003Bom15; 2002(4)ALLMR617; 2002(6)BomCR637; (2002)4BOMLR760; 2003(1)MhLj804

D.B. Bhosale, J.1. These two writ petitions involve common issue as to whether parties before the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum (for short 'Consumer Forum') and Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (for short, 'State Commission') are entitled

Prudential Capital Markets Ltd., Calcutta Vs. State of A.P. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ConsumerConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2(1), 3, 12 and 27(1); Indian Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10-E and 58-A; Reserve Bank of India Act - Sections 45-Q and 45-QA; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138; CLB Regulations, 1991 - Regulation 21; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections - 9; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections - 193, 195, 196 and 228; Banking Laws (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1963; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections - 34; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections - 9;

Reported in : 2000(5)ALD418; 2000(5)ALT468; [2002]108CompCas441(AP)

Calcutta is the petitioner. In all the petitions they prayed for a writ of prohibition, prohibiting the District ConsumerDisputes Redressal Forum (hereafter called 'the District Forum') or the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereafter called the State

Torrent Power Ltd. Vs. Kevalchand Dhanraj Bhandari

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 127, 153(5), 156 and 173; Electricity Act, 1910; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948; Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : AIR2008Guj15

the supply was disconnected. On 17-6-1996, the amount of Rs. 15,000/- ad hoc was paid and the respondent consumer preferred Complaint No. 413/97 before the Consumer Forum of Ahmedabad City on 28-5-1997. In response to the proceedings

State of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Shyam Sunder Gupta and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 10; Consumer Protection Rules, 1987 - Rule 3

Reported in : RLW2003(4)Raj2081; 2003(3)WLC690

Association and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan (3). Following questions are referred to this Larger Bench:-1. Whether .President, consumer Forum gets salary of a District Judge?2. If a person already in service is appointed as President, Consumer

The Registrar, University of Madras, Chepauk, Madras - 600005 and Othe ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Consumer

Reported in : (1995)IIMLJ367

in this batch of writ petitions, one relating to the validity of some of the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (Act No. 68 of 1986), (hereinafter called 'the Act'), and the other relating to the

Dr. C.S. Subramanian Vs. Kumarasamy and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Consumer

Reported in : [1996]86CompCas747(Mad)

writ petitions involved for determination certain common and identical issues currently in controversy in the Medical circles and consumer litigation relating to the applicability or otherwise of the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (Central Act

Economic Transport Organization Vs. Charan Spinning Mills (P) Ltd. and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConsumerInsurance

Acts : Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 2 and 14(1); ;Carriers Act, 1865 - Sections 8 and 9; ;Consumer Protection Act, 1988 - Section 2; ;Limitation Act - Section 14; ;Marine Insurance Act, 1963 - Section 79; ;Contract Act, 1872 - Section 140; ;Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 3, 6 and 130; ;Stamp Act; ;Insurance Law

Reported in : JT2010(2)SC271,2010(2)SCALE427,2010(2)LC1004(SC)

in favour of the second respondent on 15.2.1996. Thereafter, respondents 1 and 2 filed a complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 ('Act' for short) against the appellant before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Dindigul, claiming

B.W.S.S.B. Vs. Ramakrishna Aithal

Court : Karnataka

Subject : CivilConsumer

Acts : Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1964 - Sections 31; Bangalore Water Supply Regulations, 1965 - Regulation 7 and 7A; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : ILR1986KAR488

Petition No. 34141 of 1981 and connected Writ Petitions.2. In the Writ Petitions, the petitioners, who are non-domestic consumers of water supplied by the Board in the City of Bangalore, questioned the validity of Regulation 7-A introduced

Ananth Engineering Works and anr. Vs. Karnataka Electricity Board (Kpt ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : ConstitutionConsumer

Acts : Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 26, 49, 49(1) and 79; Karnataka Electricity Board Electricity (Supply) Regulations, 1988 - Regulations 9, 9.04(2), 9.4(2), 9.7 and 9.08; Indian Electricity Act - Sections 22; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 19

Reported in : 2004(3)KarLJ337

load of 6.72 K.Ws., which was sanctioned by order dated 19-6-1995. On payment of the requisite amount, the Consumers got connection to the celler and the ground floor. The Board has in all, installed 28 meters to