Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Evans Vs. Bennett

Evans vs Bennett

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1979
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/104680

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
440 U.S. 987
Subject
Other Taxes

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Other Taxes

Key legal issue
Other Taxes

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Evans

Respondent

Bennett

Excerpt

evans v. bennett - 440 u.s. 987 (1979) u.s. supreme court evans v. bennett , 440 u.s. 987 (1979) 440 u.s. 987 betty evans, individually and as next friend acting on behalf of john louis evans iii, applicant, v. larry bennett, commissioner, alabama correctional system, et al no. a-868 supreme court of the united states april 13, 1979 application for stay of execution, presented to mr. justice rehnquist and by him referred to the court, denied. mr. justice brennan, concurring: it should be noted that the applicant has filed a letter with the clerk of the court stating in part: "1. on april 11, 1979, john louis evans, applicant's son, signed and verified a petition for writ of habeas corpus and stay of execution for filing with the united states district court for the southern district of alabama. 2. also, on april 11, 1979, that verified petition was mailed for filing to the clerk of that court. 3. as of april 11, 1979, the alabama supreme court had not yet set a new execution date for john louis evans. the above stated facts may make it unnecessary for the court to rule on her application for a stay at its conference on friday, april 13. should the district court grant her son's application for a stay of execution, the application for a stay before this court would become moot. applicant is aware that the temporary stay granted in this action expires at 5:00 p. m. on april 13, 1979. no harm will come to applicant by the expiration of the temporary stay since the alabama supreme court has not yet set a new execution date for her son and, until such date is set, her son cannot be executed." in view of the foregoing, it is apparent that there is now no need to grant the application. mr. justice powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.[ evans v. bennett 440 u.s. 987 (1979) ]

Full Judgment

EVANS v. BENNETT - 440 U.S. 987 (1979)
U.S. Supreme Court EVANS v. BENNETT , 440 U.S. 987 (1979)

440 U.S. 987

Betty EVANS, Individually and as Next Friend Acting on Behalf of John Louis Evans III, applicant,
v.
Larry BENNETT, Commissioner, Alabama Correctional System, et al
No. A-868

Supreme Court of the United States

April 13, 1979

Application for stay of execution, presented to Mr. Justice REHNQUIST and by him referred to the Court, denied.

Mr. Justice BRENNAN, concurring:

It should be noted that the applicant has filed a letter with the Clerk of the Court stating in part:

    "1. On April 11, 1979, John Louis Evans, applicant's son, signed and verified a petition for writ of habeas corpus and stay of execution for filing with the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama.

2. Also, on April 11, 1979, that verified petition was mailed for filing to the clerk of that court.

3. As of April 11, 1979, the Alabama Supreme Court had not yet set a new execution date for John Louis Evans.

The above stated facts may make it unnecessary for the Court to rule on her application for a stay at its conference on Friday, April 13. Should the District Court grant her son's application for a stay of execution, the application for a stay before this Court would become moot. Applicant is aware that the temporary stay granted in this action expires at 5:00 p. m. on April 13, 1979. No harm will come to applicant by the expiration of the temporary stay since the Alabama Supreme Court has not yet set a new execution date for her son and, until such date is set, her son cannot be executed."

In view of the foregoing, it is apparent that there is now no need to grant the application.

Mr. Justice POWELL took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.[ Evans v. Bennett 440 U.S. 987 (1979) ]

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial