Advanced Search Results
The Tabocco Institute of India Vs. Union of India
Karnataka
Dec-15-2017
Land Acquisition
is further contended that when the cigarettes and other tobacco products leave the manufacturers’ premises, excise duty and other taxes are paid thereon. But on account of rotation in the health warnings, by the Central Government having regard
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Vinyl Chemicals (India) Ltd Vs. National Insurance Co Ltd
Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai
Oct-18-2012
MRTP
Narendra Kawde, Member 1. All these appeals have been filed challenging the orders dated 30/11/2010 passed in consumer complaint nos.176/2007, 177/2007, 178/2007, 179/2007, 180/2007, orders dated 21/12/2010 passed in consumer complaint nos.181/2007, 182/2007 and 183/2007 and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVani Selvarajan vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Karnataka
Dec-05-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 36749 OF 2025 (T-IT) BETWEEN:1. VANI SELVARAJAND/O OF SRI G SELVARAJAN,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Blake Vs. Mcclung
US Supreme Court
Dec-12-1898
Land Acquisition
the state; to take, hold, and dispose of property, either real or personal, and an exemption from higher taxes or impositions than are paid by the other citizens of the state, may be mentioned as some of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Bengal Immunity Company Limited Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-06-1955
Sales TaxConstitution
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 4; ;Constitution of India - Articles 141, 226, 286, 286(1), 286(1)(A), 286(2) and 286(3); Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 13 and 33
AIR1955SC661; [1955]2SCR603; [1955]6STC446(SC)
any office, godown or laboratory in that State. On the 24th October, 1951 the Assistant Superintendent of Commercial Taxes, Bihar wrote a letter to the appellant company which concluded as follows :- 'Necessary action may therefore be
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadhukar Mohit Khare vs Income Tax Officer,
Karnataka
Oct-28-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 20239 OF 2025 (T-IT) BETWEEN: MADHUKAR MOHIT KHARE, AGED ABOUT 56...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPaul Vs. Virginia
US Supreme Court
Jan-01-1869
Education
Paul v. Virginia - 75 U.S. 168 (1869) U.S. Supreme Court Paul v. Virginia, 75 U.S. 7 Wall. 168 168 (1869) Paul v. Virginia 75 U.S. (7 Wall.) 168 ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSonachalam Pillai and ors. Vs. Kumaravelu Chettiar and ors.
Chennai
Sep-16-1927
Civil
(1928)54MLJ8
1. The plaintiffs are Vaniyars or oil-mongers of Tiruchendur. They sue for a declaration that they are entitled to worship in the Subrahmaniaswami temple at Tiruchendur by going into the inner Mayil Maha Mantapam, to go...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSkava Electric Private Limited vs Income Tax Officer
Karnataka
Nov-10-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 33609 OF 2025 (T-RES) BETWEEN: SKAVA ELECTRIC PRIVATE LIMITED, NO. 5,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNilesh Mahadeorao Dhakare Vs. State of Maharashtra Department of Educa ...
Mumbai Nagpur
Jan-24-2014
Education
Oral Judgment: (A.S. Chandurkar, J.) 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally with the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. The issue raised in the present Writ Petition is whether the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »