Advanced Search Results

The Tabocco Institute of India Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

is further contended that when the cigarettes and other tobacco products leave the manufacturers’ premises, excise duty and other taxes are paid thereon. But on account of rotation in the health warnings, by the Central Government having regard

M/S Vinyl Chemicals (India) Ltd Vs. National Insurance Co Ltd

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Mumbai

Subject : MRTP

Narendra Kawde, Member 1. All these appeals have been filed challenging the orders dated 30/11/2010 passed in consumer complaint nos.176/2007, 177/2007, 178/2007, 179/2007, 180/2007, orders dated 21/12/2010 passed in consumer complaint nos.181/2007, 182/2007 and 183/2007 and...

Blake Vs. Mcclung

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

the state; to take, hold, and dispose of property, either real or personal, and an exemption from higher taxes or impositions than are paid by the other citizens of the state, may be mentioned as some of

The Bengal Immunity Company Limited Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales TaxConstitution

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 4; ;Constitution of India - Articles 141, 226, 286, 286(1), 286(1)(A), 286(2) and 286(3); Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1947 - Sections 13 and 33

Reported in : AIR1955SC661; [1955]2SCR603; [1955]6STC446(SC)

any office, godown or laboratory in that State. On the 24th October, 1951 the Assistant Superintendent of Commercial Taxes, Bihar wrote a letter to the appellant company which concluded as follows :- 'Necessary action may therefore be

Paul Vs. Virginia

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Education

Paul v. Virginia - 75 U.S. 168 (1869) U.S. Supreme Court Paul v. Virginia, 75 U.S. 7 Wall. 168 168 (1869) Paul v. Virginia 75 U.S. (7 Wall.) 168 ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS...

Sonachalam Pillai and ors. Vs. Kumaravelu Chettiar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1928)54MLJ8

1. The plaintiffs are Vaniyars or oil-mongers of Tiruchendur. They sue for a declaration that they are entitled to worship in the Subrahmaniaswami temple at Tiruchendur by going into the inner Mayil Maha Mantapam, to go...

Nilesh Mahadeorao Dhakare Vs. State of Maharashtra Department of Educa ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Education

Oral Judgment: (A.S. Chandurkar, J.) 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally with the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. The issue raised in the present Writ Petition is whether the...

A.M. Abdul Rahman Vs. V. Jayaram

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 24

Reported in : ILR1990KAR2962

ORDERRamachandriah, J.1. This is a transfer petition filed under Section 24 C.P.C. by the first respondent in H.R.C.No. 10842/83 on the file of the 4th Additional Judge, Court of Small Causes, Mayohall, Bangalore (hereinafter referred to...

Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited Vs. Telecom Regulatory Authority of

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)2CompLJ151TelecomDSAT

1. Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited (VSNL) has filed this appeal challenging the Tariff Order of Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) dated 8th September 2005, (Telecommunication Tariff [Thirty Ninth Amendment] Order, 2005) whereby TRAI has fixed...

Chambers Vs. Baltimore and Ohio R. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

Chambers v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. - 207 U.S. 142 (1907) U.S. Supreme Court Chambers v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 207 U.S. 142 (1907) Chambers v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company No. 22 Argued...