Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

GersteIn Vs. Coe

Gerstein vs Coe

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-03-1974
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/103505

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
417 U.S. 279
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Gerstein

Respondent

Coe

Excerpt

gerstein v. coe - 417 u.s. 279 (1974) u.s. supreme court gerstein v. coe, 417 u.s. 279 (1974) gerstein v. coe no. 73-1157 decided june 3, 1974 417 u.s. 279 appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of florida syllabus state's appeal under 28 u.s.c. § 1253 from a declaratory judgment of a three-judge district court invalidating a state statute dismissed for want of jurisdiction, since § 1253 does not authorize appeal to this court from the grant or denial of declaratory relief alone. dismissed for want of jurisdiction; certiorari before judgment to court of appeals denied. per curiam. a three-judge district court entered a declaratory judgment holding unconstitutional a florida statute, fla.stat.ann. § 458.22(3) (supp. 1974-1975), which forbids an abortion without the consent of the husband, if the woman is married, and if unmarried and under the age of 18, without the consent of a parent. because it was anticipated that the state would respect the declaratory judgment, the court declined to issue an injunction against the enforcement of the statute. the state of florida appeals from the declaratory judgment invalidating the statute. the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. title 28 u.s.c. § 1253, under which this appeal is sought to be taken, does not authorize an appeal from the grant or denial of declaratory relief alone. gunn v. university committee, 399 u. s. 383 (1970); mitchell v. donovan, 398 u. s. 427 (1970); rockefeller v. catholic medical center of brooklyn & queens, inc., division of st. mary's hospital, 397 u. s. 820 (1970); see also roe v. wade, 410 u. s. 113 , 410 u. s. 123 (1973). the declaratory judgment is appealable to the court of appeals, and we are informed that an page 417 u. s. 280 appeal to that court has already been taken. it is suggested that we treat the stateme

Full Judgment

Gerstein v. Coe - 417 U.S. 279 (1974)
U.S. Supreme Court Gerstein v. Coe, 417 U.S. 279 (1974)

Gerstein v. Coe

No. 73-1157

Decided June 3, 1974

417 U.S. 279

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

SYLLABUS

State's appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1253 from a declaratory judgment of a three-judge District Court invalidating a state statute dismissed for want of jurisdiction, since § 1253 does not authorize appeal to this Court from the grant or denial of declaratory relief alone.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction; certiorari before judgment to Court of Appeals denied.

PER CURIAM.

A three-judge District Court entered a declaratory judgment holding unconstitutional a Florida statute, Fla.Stat.Ann. § 458.22(3) (Supp. 1974-1975), which forbids an abortion without the consent of the husband, if the woman is married, and if unmarried and under the age of 18, without the consent of a parent. Because it was anticipated that the State would respect the declaratory judgment, the court declined to issue an injunction against the enforcement of the statute. The State of Florida appeals from the declaratory judgment invalidating the statute. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Title 28 U.S.C. § 1253, under which this appeal is sought to be taken, does not authorize an appeal from the grant or denial of declaratory relief alone. Gunn v. University Committee, 399 U. S. 383 (1970); Mitchell v. Donovan, 398 U. S. 427 (1970); Rockefeller v. Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc., Division of St. Mary's Hospital, 397 U. S. 820 (1970); see also Roe v. Wade, 410 U. S. 113 , 410 U. S. 123 (1973). The declaratory judgment is appealable to the Court of Appeals, and we are informed that an

Page 417 U. S. 280

appeal to that court has already been taken. It is suggested that we treat the statement of jurisdiction as a petition for certiorari before judgment to the Court of Appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1254(1). The petition for certiorari is denied.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial