Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Carey Vs. Wynn

Carey vs Wynn

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-16-1978
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/104318

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
439 U.S. 8
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Carey

Respondent

Wynn

Excerpt

carey v. wynn - 439 u.s. 8 (1978) u.s. supreme court carey v. wynn, 439 u.s. 8 (1978) carey v. wynn no. 78-229 decided october 16, 1978 * 439 u.s. 8 on appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of illinois syllabus this court has no jurisdiction under 28 u.s.c. § 1253 over appeals from a three-judge district court's declaratory judgment invalidating certain state statutory provisions, such judgment being appealable only to the court of appeals. appeals dismissed. reported below: 449 f.supp. 1302. per curiam. a three-judge district court entered a declaratory judgment holding unconstitutional certain sections of the illinois abortion act of 1975, ill.rev.stat., ch. 38, § 81-21 et seq. (supp. 1976). wynn v. scott, 449 f.supp. 1302 (nd ill.1978). the district court assumed that illinois prosecutors would recognize and abide by the declaratory judgment, and denied plaintiffs' request for injunctive relief. id. at 1331. the appeals from the declaratory judgment invalidating certain provisions of the statute are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. title 28 u.s.c. § 1253, the jurisdictional statute under which these appeals are taken, does not authorize an appeal from the grant or denial of declaratory relief alone. gerstein v. coe, 417 u. s. 279 (1974). the declaratory judgment is appealable to the court of appeals, and we are informed that appeals to that court have been taken. appeals dismissed. mr. justice stevens took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases. * together with no. 7239, diamond v. wynn et al., also on appeal from the same court.

Full Judgment

Carey v. Wynn - 439 U.S. 8 (1978)
U.S. Supreme Court Carey v. Wynn, 439 U.S. 8 (1978)

Carey v. Wynn

No. 78-229

Decided October 16, 1978 *

439 U.S. 8

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

SYLLABUS

This Court has no jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1253 over appeals from a three-judge District Court's declaratory judgment invalidating certain state statutory provisions, such judgment being appealable only to the Court of Appeals.

Appeals dismissed. Reported below: 449 F.Supp. 1302.

PER CURIAM.

A three-judge District Court entered a declaratory judgment holding unconstitutional certain sections of the Illinois Abortion Act of 1975, Ill.Rev.Stat., ch. 38, § 81-21 et seq. (Supp. 1976). Wynn v. Scott, 449 F.Supp. 1302 (ND Ill.1978). The District Court assumed that Illinois prosecutors would recognize and abide by the declaratory judgment, and denied plaintiffs' request for injunctive relief. Id. at 1331.

The appeals from the declaratory judgment invalidating certain provisions of the statute are dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Title 28 U.S.C. § 1253, the jurisdictional statute under which these appeals are taken, does not authorize an appeal from the grant or denial of declaratory relief alone. Gerstein v. Coe, 417 U. S. 279 (1974). The declaratory judgment is appealable to the Court of Appeals, and we are informed that appeals to that court have been taken.

Appeals dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE STEVENS took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

* Together with No. 7239, Diamond v. Wynn et al., also on appeal from the same court.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial