Jefferson Vs. Hackney

Jefferson vs Hackney

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1970

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102705

CiteSignal

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/102705
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: 1970
Case Number: 397 U.S. 821

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jefferson

Respondent

Hackney

Bonus Feature

AI Brief & Ask

Part of AI Studio: get a comprehensive 18-section AI Brief and case-scoped chat on this judgment, plus Verdict Lens, Devil's Bench, and DocMind from the AI Studio hub.

Subscribers get structured AI Briefs and case-scoped chat. Learn more.

Excerpt

jefferson v. hackney - 397 u.s. 821 (1970) u.s. supreme court jefferson v. hackney , 397 u.s. 821 (1970) 397 u.s. 821 ruth j. jefferson et al. v. burton g. hackney, commissioner, department of public welfare of texas, et al. no. 1345, misc. supreme court of the united states may 4, 1970 ed j. polk and carl rachlin, for appellants. crawford c. martin, atty. gen. of texas, nola white, first asst. atty. gen., pat bailey, executive asst. atty. gen., and w. o. shultz ii, asst. atty. gen., for appellees. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the united states district court for the northern district of texas for further consideration in light of rosado v. wyman, 397 u.s. 397 .[ jefferson v. hackney 397 u.s. 821 (1970) ]

Full Judgment

JEFFERSON v. HACKNEY - 397 U.S. 821 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court JEFFERSON v. HACKNEY , 397 U.S. 821 (1970)

397 U.S. 821

Ruth J. JEFFERSON et al.
v.
Burton G. HACKNEY, Commissioner, Department of Public Welfare of Texas, et al.
No. 1345, Misc.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 4, 1970

Ed J. Polk and Carl Rachlin, for appellants.

Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Nola White, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Pat Bailey, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., and W. O. Shultz II, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas for further consideration in light of Rosado v. Wyman, 397 U.S. 397 .[ Jefferson v. Hackney 397 U.S. 821 (1970) ]