Jefferson Vs. Hackney

Jefferson vs Hackney

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1970

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102705

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/102705
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: 1970
Case Number: 397 U.S. 821
Subject: MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue: MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jefferson

Respondent

Hackney

Excerpt

jefferson v. hackney - 397 u.s. 821 (1970) u.s. supreme court jefferson v. hackney , 397 u.s. 821 (1970) 397 u.s. 821 ruth j. jefferson et al. v. burton g. hackney, commissioner, department of public welfare of texas, et al. no. 1345, misc. supreme court of the united states may 4, 1970 ed j. polk and carl rachlin, for appellants. crawford c. martin, atty. gen. of texas, nola white, first asst. atty. gen., pat bailey, executive asst. atty. gen., and w. o. shultz ii, asst. atty. gen., for appellees. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the united states district court for the northern district of texas for further consideration in light of rosado v. wyman, 397 u.s. 397 .[ jefferson v. hackney 397 u.s. 821 (1970) ]

Full Judgment

JEFFERSON v. HACKNEY - 397 U.S. 821 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court JEFFERSON v. HACKNEY , 397 U.S. 821 (1970)

397 U.S. 821

Ruth J. JEFFERSON et al.
v.
Burton G. HACKNEY, Commissioner, Department of Public Welfare of Texas, et al.
No. 1345, Misc.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 4, 1970

Ed J. Polk and Carl Rachlin, for appellants.

Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Nola White, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Pat Bailey, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., and W. O. Shultz II, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas for further consideration in light of Rosado v. Wyman, 397 U.S. 397 .[ Jefferson v. Hackney 397 U.S. 821 (1970) ]

Same Parties Jefferson vs Hackney Same Subject MRTP