Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Lampton Vs. Bonin

Lampton vs Bonin

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1970
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102701

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
397 U.S. 663
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Lampton

Respondent

Bonin

Excerpt

lampton v. bonin - 397 u.s. 663 (1970) u.s. supreme court lampton v. bonin , 397 u.s. 663 (1970) 397 u.s. 663 shirley lampton et al. v. garland l. bonin et al. no. 1112, misc. supreme court of the united states april 27, 1970 rehearing denied june 1, 1970. see 398 u.s. 945. jeffrey b. schwartz and richard s. buckley, for appellants. jack p. f. gremillion, atty. gen. of louisiana, and william p. schuler and dorothy d. wolbrette, asst. attys. gen., for appellees. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted and the judgment of the united states district court is vacated. the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of rosado v. wyman, 397 u.s. 397 . the chief justice and mr. justice black dissent for the reasons set forth in mr. justice black's dissenting opinion in rosado v. wyman, 397 u.s. 430.[ lampton v. bonin 397 u.s. 663 (1970) ]

Full Judgment

LAMPTON v. BONIN - 397 U.S. 663 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court LAMPTON v. BONIN , 397 U.S. 663 (1970)

397 U.S. 663

Shirley LAMPTON et al.
v.
Garland L. BONIN et al.
No. 1112, Misc.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 27, 1970

Rehearing Denied June 1, 1970.

See 398 U.S. 945.

Jeffrey B. Schwartz and Richard S. Buckley, for appellants.

Jack P. F. Gremillion, Atty. Gen. of Louisiana, and William P. Schuler and Dorothy D. Wolbrette, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted and the judgment of the United States District Court is vacated. The case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Rosado v. Wyman, 397 U.S. 397 .

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and Mr. Justice BLACK dissent for the reasons set forth in Mr. Justice Black's dissenting opinion in Rosado v. Wyman, 397 U.S. 430.[ Lampton v. Bonin 397 U.S. 663 (1970) ]

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial