U S Vs. Rowell

U S vs Rowell

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1970

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102700

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/102700
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: 1970
Case Number: 397 U.S. 662
Subject: Service

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service

Key legal issue: Service

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

U S

Respondent

Rowell

Excerpt

u s v. rowell - 397 u.s. 662 (1970) u.s. supreme court u s v. rowell , 397 u.s. 662 (1970) 397 u.s. 662 united states v. howard eugene rowell. no. 863. supreme court of the united states april 27, 1970 solicitor general griswold, assistant attorney general wilson, beatrice rosenberg, and mervyn hamburg, for the united states. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eighth circuit. per curiam. the motion of the respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. the petition for a writ of certiorari is also granted and the judgment of the united states court of appeals is vacated. the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of buie v. united states, 396 u.s. 87 .[ u s v. rowell 397 u.s. 662 (1970) ]

Full Judgment

U S v. ROWELL - 397 U.S. 662 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court U S v. ROWELL , 397 U.S. 662 (1970)

397 U.S. 662

UNITED STATES
v.
Howard Eugene ROWELL.
No. 863.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 27, 1970

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Mervyn Hamburg, for the United States.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of the respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is also granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Buie v. United States, 396 U.S. 87 .[ U S v. Rowell 397 U.S. 662 (1970) ]

Same Parties U S vs Rowell Same Subject Service