Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Johnson Vs. Wasserman

Johnson vs Wasserman

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Feb-02-1970
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102653

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
396 U.S. 554
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Johnson

Respondent

Wasserman

Excerpt

johnson v. wasserman - 396 u.s. 554 (1970) u.s. supreme court johnson v. wasserman, 396 u.s. 554 (1970) 396 u.s. 554 johnson et al. v. wasserman, judge, et al. appeal from the supreme court of ohio no. 832. decided february 2, 1970 appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. alvin a. fein for appellants. john t. corrigan and john l. dowling for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. kirk v. board of regents of university of california, 396 u.s. 554 (1970) 396 u.s. 554 (1970) "> u.s. supreme court kirk v. board of regents of university of california, 396 u.s. 554 (1970) 396 u.s. 554 kirk v. board of regents of the university of california appeal from the court of appeal of california, first appellate district no. 836. decided february 2, 1970 273 cal. app. 2d 430, 78 cal. rptr. 260, appeal dismissed. charles r. b. kirk, norman dorsen, clark byse, and william w. van alstyne for appellant. thomas j. cunningham and david w. louisell for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 396 u.s. 554, 555

Full Judgment

JOHNSON v. WASSERMAN - 396 U.S. 554 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court JOHNSON v. WASSERMAN, 396 U.S. 554 (1970) 396 U.S. 554

JOHNSON ET AL. v. WASSERMAN, JUDGE, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
No. 832.
Decided February 2, 1970

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Alvin A. Fein for appellants.

John T. Corrigan and John L. Dowling for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


KIRK v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, <a href="/102653"> 396 U.S. 554 </a> (1970) 396 U.S. 554 (1970) "> U.S. Supreme Court KIRK v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, 396 U.S. 554 (1970) 396 U.S. 554

KIRK v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
No. 836.
Decided February 2, 1970

273 Cal. App. 2d 430, 78 Cal. Rptr. 260, appeal dismissed.

Charles R. B. Kirk, Norman Dorsen, Clark Byse, and William W. Van Alstyne for appellant.

Thomas J. Cunningham and David W. Louisell for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 396 U.S. 554, 555



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial