Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Freed Vs. Baldi

Freed vs Baldi

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jan-13-1969
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102463

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
393 U.S. 317
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Freed

Respondent

Baldi

Excerpt

freed v. baldi - 393 u.s. 317 (1969) u.s. supreme court freed v. baldi, 393 u.s. 317 (1969) 393 u.s. 317 freed v. baldi et al. appeal from the supreme court of colorado. no. 652. decided january 13, 1969. ___ colo. ___, 443 p.2d 716, appeal dismissed. george louis creamer for appellant. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. bennett v. cottingham, 393 u.s. 317 (1969) 393 u.s. 317 (1969) "> u.s. supreme court bennett v. cottingham, 393 u.s. 317 (1969) 393 u.s. 317 bennett et al. v. cottingham et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of alabama. no. 665. decided january 13, 1969. 290 f. supp. 759, affirmed. jack greenberg, michael meltsner, melvyn zarr, oscar w. adams, jr., and anthony g. amsterdam for appellants. macdonald gallion, attorney general of alabama, pro se, and robert p. bradley, assistant attorney general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. the chief justice, mr. justice harlan, and mr. justice brennan are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. page 393 u.s. 317, 318

Full Judgment

FREED v. BALDI - 393 U.S. 317 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court FREED v. BALDI, 393 U.S. 317 (1969) 393 U.S. 317

FREED v. BALDI ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO.
No. 652.
Decided January 13, 1969.

___ Colo. ___, 443 P.2d 716, appeal dismissed.

George Louis Creamer for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


BENNETT v. COTTINGHAM, <a href="/102463"> 393 U.S. 317 </a> (1969) 393 U.S. 317 (1969) "> U.S. Supreme Court BENNETT v. COTTINGHAM, 393 U.S. 317 (1969) 393 U.S. 317

BENNETT ET AL. v. COTTINGHAM ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. No. 665.
Decided January 13, 1969.

290 F. Supp. 759, affirmed.

Jack Greenberg, Michael Meltsner, Melvyn Zarr, Oscar W. Adams, Jr., and Anthony G. Amsterdam for appellants.

MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, pro se, and Robert P. Bradley, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 393 U.S. 317, 318



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial