Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Burton Vs. Sills

Burton vs Sills

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Apr-28-1969
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102350

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
394 U.S. 812
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Burton

Respondent

Sills

Excerpt

burton v. sills - 394 u.s. 812 (1969) u.s. supreme court burton v. sills, 394 u.s. 812 (1969) 394 u.s. 812 burton et al. v. sills, attorney general of new jersey, et al. appeal from the supreme court of new jersey. no. 1158. decided april 28, 1969. 53 n. j. 86, 248 a. 2d 521, appeal dismissed. william e. ozzard for appellants. arthur j. sills, attorney general of new jersey, pro se, marilyn loftus schauer, acting first assistant attorney general, and stephen skillman, deputy attorney general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. sullivan v. alabama state bar, 394 u.s. 812 (1969) 394 u.s. 812 (1969) "> u.s. supreme court sullivan v. alabama state bar, 394 u.s. 812 (1969) 394 u.s. 812 sullivan v. alabama state bar et al. appeal from the united states district court for the middle district of alabama. no. 1170. decided april 28, 1969. 295 f. supp. 1216, affirmed. fred blanton, jr., for appellant. truman hobbs for appellees. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. page 394 u.s. 812, 813

Full Judgment

BURTON v. SILLS - 394 U.S. 812 (1969)
U.S. Supreme Court BURTON v. SILLS, 394 U.S. 812 (1969) 394 U.S. 812

BURTON ET AL. v. SILLS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 1158.
Decided April 28, 1969.

53 N. J. 86, 248 A. 2d 521, appeal dismissed.

William E. Ozzard for appellants.

Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, pro se, Marilyn Loftus Schauer, Acting First Assistant Attorney General, and Stephen Skillman, Deputy Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


SULLIVAN v. ALABAMA STATE BAR, <a href="/102350"> 394 U.S. 812 </a> (1969) 394 U.S. 812 (1969) "> U.S. Supreme Court SULLIVAN v. ALABAMA STATE BAR, 394 U.S. 812 (1969) 394 U.S. 812

SULLIVAN v. ALABAMA STATE BAR ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. No. 1170.
Decided April 28, 1969.

295 F. Supp. 1216, affirmed.

Fred Blanton, Jr., for appellant.

Truman Hobbs for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 394 U.S. 812, 813



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial