Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

O'Callahan vs. Parker

O'Callahan vs Parker

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1968
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102149

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
393 U.S. 822
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

O'Callahan

Respondent

Parker

Excerpt

o'callahan v. parker - 393 u.s. 822 (1968) u.s. supreme court o'callahan v. parker , 393 u.s. 822 (1968) 393 u.s. 822 james f. o'callahan, petitioner, v. j. j. parker, warden. no. 202, misc. supreme court of the united states october 14, 1968 victor rabinowitz and leonard b. boudin, for petitioner. solicitor general griswold, for respondent. motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the third circuit granted limited to the first question presented by the petition which reads as follows: '1. does a court-martial, held under the articles of war, tit. 10, u. s.c. 801 et seq., have jurisdiction to try a member of the armed forces who is charged with commission of a crime cognizable in a civilian court and having no military significance, alleged to have been committed off-post and while on leave, thus depriving him of his constitutional rights to indictment by a grand jury and trial by a petit jury in a civilian court?' case transferred to the appellate docket and placed on the summary calendar.[ o'callahan v. parker 393 u.s. 822 (1968) ]

Full Judgment

O'CALLAHAN v. PARKER - 393 U.S. 822 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court O'CALLAHAN v. PARKER , 393 U.S. 822 (1968)

393 U.S. 822

James F. O'CALLAHAN, petitioner,
v.
J. J. PARKER, Warden.
No. 202, Misc.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 14, 1968

Victor Rabinowitz and Leonard B. Boudin, for petitioner.

Solicitor General Griswold, for respondent.

Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted limited to the first question presented by the petition which reads as follows:

    '1. Does a court-martial, held under the Articles of War, Tit. 10, U. S.C. 801 et seq., have jurisdiction to try a member of the Armed Forces who is charged with commission of a crime cognizable in a civilian court and having no military significance, alleged to have been committed off-post and while on leave, thus depriving him of his constitutional rights to indictment by a grand jury and trial by a petit jury in a civilian court?'

Case transferred to the appellate docket and placed on the summary calendar.[ O'Callahan v. Parker 393 U.S. 822 (1968) ]

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial